Cited by 43Memory and Neural MechanismsPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Facilitation of Extinction of Conditioned Fear by D-Cycloserine: Implications for Psychotherapy

Davis, Michael, Myers, Karyn M., Ressler, Kerry J., Rothbaum, Barbara O.·2005·Current Directions in Psychological Science

Abstract

Excessive fear and anxiety are characteristic of disorders such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and phobias and are believed to reflect abnormalities in neural systems governing the development and reduction of conditioned fear. Conditioned fear can be suppressed through a process known as extinction, in which repeated exposure to a feared stimulus in the absence of an aversive event leads to a gradual reduction in the fear response to that stimulus. Like conditioned fear learning, extinction is dependent on a particular protein (the N-methyl-D-aspartate or NMDA receptor) in a part of the brain called the amygdala. Blockade of this receptor blocks extinction and improving the activity of this receptor with a drug called D-cycloserine speeds up extinction in rats. Because exposure-based psychotherapy for fear disorders in humans resembles extinction in several respects, we investigated whether D-cycloserine might facilitate the loss of fear in human patients. Consistent with findings from the animal laboratory, patients receiving D-cycloserine benefited more from exposure-based psychotherapy than did placebo-treated controls. Although very preliminary, these data provide initial support for the use of cognitive enhancers in psychotherapy and demonstrate that preclinical studies in rodents can have direct benefits to humans.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00367.x

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Understanding key mechanisms of extinction has already improved the effectiveness of extinction-based treatment.

    “I mentioned above the work on fear conditioning and how understanding key mechanisms of extinction has already improved the effectiveness of extinction-based treatment (Davis et al. 2005).”

    From Mediators and Mechanisms of Change in Psychotherapy Research (2007) · cites this paper as Davis et al. 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davis, M., Myers, K. M., Ressler, K. J., & Rothbaum, B. O.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences
Corresponding author
Davis, Michael
Venue
Current Directions in Psychological Science
Published
2005-08
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
214-219
ISSN
  • 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8721
OpenAlex
W2129612711
Cited by
43
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
D-cycloserine, fear extinction, fear conditioning, NMDA receptor, amygdala, post-traumatic stress disorder, phobia, nootropic drugs, anxiety disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review