The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Networked Interactivity
Abstract
What makes computer-mediated groups tick and/or stick? To what degree are computer-mediated discussants really sustained “groups”? Does the grouping quality reflect anything beyond technical structure? Are technical structure and grouping related? How do threads define groups, or vice-versa? Does any of this change between academic and commercial networks?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Colleoni, E., Rozza, A., & Arvidsson, A. (2014) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/jcom.12084 · Cited by 1,151
Ma, M., & Agarwal, R. (2007) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1070.0113 · Cited by 1,143
Nambisan, S., & Baron, R. A. (2009) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00667.x · Cited by 908
Computer-Mediated Discourse Analysis: An Approach to Researching Online Behavior
Herring, S. C. (2004) · Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805080.016 · Cited by 720
Interactivity: a concept explication
Kiousis, S. (2002) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/146144480200400303 · Cited by 666
Metadata
- Authors
- Rafaeli, S., & Sudweeks, F.
- Venue
- Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-06-23
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 0-0
- ISSN
- 1083-6101 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3189151025
- Cited by
- 661
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 66.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Networked Interactivity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00201.x
- The paper
- Rafaeli, S., & Sudweeks, F. (2006). Networked Interactivity. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00201.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
