The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Patterns of communities in the tropics
Abstract
Tropical countries have many times more species of most taxa than temperate ones, and small areas in the tropics have a smaller multiple of the number of species of small temperate areas. Where many species are present, abundances tend to be more equal and geographic distributions more spotty. Most tropical environments are less seasonal and more productive, and the dry areas and mountains which are relatively more seasonal and less productive have fewer species. The species which have reached offshore islands are often much commoner there and occupy expanded habitats. To account for these relations, the following general hypothesis seems necessary : species interactions are important and the tropics have a head start on speciation. The head start, or greater rate, allows extra species to pile up in the tropics, but because of the importance of competition, no single area becomes as greatly enriched. Rather, faunal differences between areas increase. The lesser excess of tropical species in small areas is largely due to greater productivity and reduced seasonality which make marginal ways of life profitable. With more overlap in resources, the closely packed tropical species have more uniform abundances and the coexistence of these species is more precarious, causing the spotty geographic distributions. Neither the species diversity of the food supply nor the longer breeding season (supposedly allowing staggered nesting seasons with an early shift and a later shift) is relevant to bird species diversity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A General Hypothesis of Species Diversity
Huston, M. (1979) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283366 · Cited by 3,390
The statistics and biology of the species-area relationship
Connor, E. F., & McCoy, E. D. (1979) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283438 · Cited by 2,313
Sepkoski, J. J. (1984) · Paleobiology · doi:10.1017/s0094837300008186 · Cited by 773
A kinetic model of Phanerozoic taxonomic diversity I. Analysis of marine orders
Sepkoski, J. J. (1978) · Paleobiology · doi:10.1017/s0094837300005972 · Cited by 548
Dynamics of origination and extinction in the marine fossil record
Alroy, J. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0802597105 · Cited by 525
Diversity-dependence, ecological speciation, and the role of competition in macroevolution
Rabosky, D. L. (2013) · Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110512-135800 · Cited by 268
Diversification, Faunal Change, and Community Replacement during the Ordovician Radiations
Sepkoski, J. J., & Sheehan, P. M. (1983) · Topics in Geobiology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-0740-3_14 · Cited by 195
Ricklefs, R. E., Latham, R. E., & Qian, H. (1999) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3546454 · Cited by 118
Livezey, B. C. (2003) · Ornithological Monographs · doi:10.2307/40168337 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- MacARTHUR, R. H.
- Venue
- Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1969-04
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 19-30
- ISSN
- 0024-4066 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2071553182
- Cited by
- 368
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.