The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Non-invasive genetic sampling and individual identification
Open accessAbstract
Individual identification via non-invasive sampling is of prime importance in conservation genetics and in behavioural ecology. This approach allows for genetics studies of wild animals without having to catch them, or even to observe them. The material used as a source of DNA is usually faeces, shed hairs, or shed feathers. It has been recendy shown that this material may lead to genotyping errors, mainly due to allelic dropout. In addition to these technical errors, there are problems with accurately estimating the probability of identity (PI, or the probability of two individuals having identical genotypes) because of the presence of close relatives in natural populations. As a consequence, before initiating an extensive study involving non-invasive sampling, we strongly suggest conducting a pilot study to assess both the technical difficulties and the PI for the genetic markers to be used. This pilot study could be carried out in three steps: (i) estimation of the PI using preliminary genetic data; (ii) simulations taking into account the PI and choosing the technical error rate mat is sufficiently low for assessing the scientific question; (iii) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) experiments to check if it is technically possible to achieve this error rate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Primer-Directed Enzymatic Amplification of DNA with a Thermostable DNA Polymerase
Saiki, R. K., Gelfand, D. H., Stoffel, S., Scharf, S. J., Higuchi, R., Horn, G. T., Mullis, K. B., & Erlich, H. A. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2448875 · Cited by 17,719
Saiki, R. K., Scharf, S., Faloona, F., Mullis, K. B., Horn, G. T., Erlich, H. A., & Arnheim, N. (1985) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2999980 · Cited by 8,956
Reliable genotyping of samples with very low DNA quantities using PCR
Taberlet, P. (1996) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/24.16.3189 · Cited by 1,491
Self-citation
Cited by
New insights from fine‐scale spatial genetic structure analyses in plant populations
Vekemans, X., & Hardy, O. J. (2004) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2004.02076.x · Cited by 1,313
SNPs in ecology, evolution and conservation
Morin, P. A., Luikart, G., Wayne, R. K., & the SNP workshop group (2004) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.01.009 · Cited by 1,080
Self-citationBurgueño, J., de los Campos, G., Weigel, K., & Crossa, J. (2012) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2011.06.0299 · Cited by 601
Reliable microsatellite genotyping of the Eurasian badger (Meles meles) using faecal DNA
Frantz, A. C., Pope, L. C., Carpenter, P. J., Roper, T. J., Wilson, G. J., Delahay, R. J., & Burke, T. (2003) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2003.01848.x · Cited by 266
Prospects for inferring pairwise relationships with single nucleotide polymorphisms
Glaubitz, J. C., Rhodes, O. E., & Dewoody, J. A. (2003) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2003.01790.x · Cited by 136
Metadata
- Authors
- TABERLET, P.
- Venue
- Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-09
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 41-55
- ISSN
- 0024-4066 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2010722055
- Cited by
- 774
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Non-invasive genetic sampling and individual identification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/bijl.1999.0329
- The paper
- TABERLET, P. (1999). Non-invasive genetic sampling and individual identification. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. https://doi.org/10.1006/bijl.1999.0329
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.