The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diagnostic Validity of the Drug Abuse Screening Test in the Assessment of DSM‐III Drug Disorders
Abstract
Summary: Diagnostic validity of the DAST was assessed using a clinical sample of 501 drug/alcohol patients. Various DAST cut‐points were validated against DSM‐III drug abuse/dependence criteria, as assessed by the Diagnostic Interview Schedule, The DAST attained 8S% overall accuracy in classifying patients according to DSM‐III diagnosis. This accuracy was maintained between DAST score cut‐points of 5/6 through 9/10. Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis indicated that 5/6 was the optimum threshold score. The DAST was also correlated with demographic variables, psychiatric history, and drug use. The results showed very good concurrent and discriminant validity. This study concluded that fairly accurate estimation of DSM‐III drug criteria could be made using a brief self‐adminstered questionnaire (DAST). However, caution must be expressed when generalizing these findings to other contexts (e.g. the justice system) where subjects may have stronger motivation to under‐report drug involvement.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Robins, L. N. (1981) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1981.01780290015001 · Cited by 5,219
Skinner, H. A. (1982) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/0306-4603(82)90005-3 · Cited by 3,134
Self-citation
Cited by
Validation of the alcohol smoking and substance involvement screening test (ASSIST)
Humeniuk, R., Ali, R., Babor, T. F., Farrell, M., Formigoni, M. L., Jittiwutikarn, J., De Lacerda, R. B., Ling, W., Marsden, J., Monteiro, M., et al. (2008) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.02114.x · Cited by 1,144
Webster, L. R., & Webster, R. M. (2005) · Pain Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1526-4637.2005.00072.x · Cited by 1,096
Babor, T. F., McRee, B. G., Kassebaum, P. A., Grimaldi, P. L., Ahmed, K., & Bray, J. (2007) · Substance Abuse · doi:10.1300/j465v28n03_03 · Cited by 1,100
A comprehensive review of the psychometric properties of the Drug Abuse Screening Test
Yudko, E., Lozhkina, O., & Fouts, A. (2007) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2006.08.002 · Cited by 906
Madras, B. K., Compton, W. M., Avula, D., Stegbauer, T., Stein, J. B., & Clark, H. W. (2009) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.08.003 · Cited by 663
Budney, A. J., Higgins, S. T., Radonovich, K. J., & Novy, P. L. (2000) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.68.6.1051 · Cited by 318
Ersche, K. D., Turton, A. J., Chamberlain, S. R., Müller, U., Bullmore, E. T., & Robbins, T. W. (2012) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.11091421 · Cited by 252
Hwang, S. W., Gogosis, E., Chambers, C., Dunn, J. R., Hoch, J. S., & Aubry, T. (2011) · Journal of Urban Health · doi:10.1007/s11524-011-9592-3 · Cited by 144
Medd, J., & Tate, R. L. (2000) · Neuropsychological Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/096020100389246 · Cited by 143
Groenman, A. P., Oosterlaan, J., Rommelse, N., Franke, B., Roeyers, H., Oades, R. D., Sergeant, J. A., Buitelaar, J. K., & Faraone, S. V. (2013) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.12188 · Cited by 138
Bray, J. W., Del Boca, F. K., McRee, B. G., Hayashi, S. W., & Babor, T. F. (2017) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.13676 · Cited by 85
Groenman, A. P., Oosterlaan, J., Rommelse, N. N. J., Franke, B., Greven, C. U., Hoekstra, P. J., Hartman, C. A., Luman, M., Roeyers, H., Oades, R. D., et al. (2013) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.112.124784 · Cited by 85
Young, M. M., Stevens, A., Galipeau, J., Pirie, T., Garritty, C., Singh, K., Yazdi, F., Golfam, M., Pratt, M., Turner, L., et al. (2014) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/2046-4053-3-50 · Cited by 83
Pancreatitis quality of life instrument: A psychometric evaluation
Wassef, W., DeWitt, J., McGreevy, K., Wilcox, M., Whitcomb, D., Yadav, D., Amann, S., Mishra, G., Alkaade, S., Romagnuolo, J., et al. (2016) · American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1038/ajg.2016.225 · Cited by 73
Willging, C. E., Green, A. E., Gunderson, L., Chaffin, M., & Aarons, G. A. (2015) · Child Maltreatment · doi:10.1177/1077559514547384 · Cited by 66
McIntosh, C. C., Crino, R. D., & O’Neill, K. (2016) · Journal of Gambling Studies · doi:10.1007/s10899-016-9602-1 · Cited by 52
Barrowclough, C., Haddock, G., Beardmore, R., Conrod, P., Craig, T., Davies, L., Dunn, G., Lewis, S., Moring, J., Tarrier, N., et al. (2009) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2009.03.007 · Cited by 51
The role of psychometric data in predicting inpatient mental health service utilization
Averill, P. M., Hopko, D. R., Small, D. R., Greenlee, H. B., & Varner, R. V. (2001) · Psychiatric Quarterly · doi:10.1023/a:1010396831037 · Cited by 29
Nicotine intake and smoking topography in smokers with bipolar disorder
Williams, J. M., Gandhi, K. K., Lu, S., Steinberg, M. L., & Benowitz, N. L. (2012) · Bipolar Disorders · doi:10.1111/j.1399-5618.2012.01047.x · Cited by 21
CJDATS Co-Occurring Disorders Screening Instrument for Mental Disorders (CODSI-MD): A Pilot Study
Sacks, S., Melnick, G., Coen, C., Banks, S., Friedmann, P. D., Grella, C., & Knight, K. (2007) · The Prison Journal · doi:10.1177/0032885506299044 · Cited by 20
Sahker, E., Jones, D., Lancianese, D. A., Pro, G., & Arndt, S. (2019) · Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities · doi:10.1007/s40615-019-00620-w · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- GAVIN, D. R., ROSS, H. E., & SKINNER, H. A.
- Venue
- British Journal of Addiction
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1989-03
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 301-307
- ISSN
- 0952-0481 (ISSN-L)
- 2056-5178
- OpenAlex
- W2113351872
- Cited by
- 454
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 1.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
