Cited by 367Gambling Behavior and TreatmentsPersonality Traits and PsychologyPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Impulsivity in pathological gambling: the antisocial impulsivist

Abstract

The construct of impulsivity has to date remained relatively unexplored in the pathological gambling literature. This is in spite of recent claims suggesting that impulsivity may be an important feature characterizing a subgroup of pathological gamblers who are claimed to suffer from a Multi-Impulse Personality Disorder. The present study examined the potential role of impulsivity using the Eysenck Impulsivity Scale among 115 pathological gamblers. Results indicate that heightened impulsivity is associated with the degree of severity of psychological and behavioural change in pathological gamblers. However, the findings also indicate that impulsivity closely mirrors components contained in Eysenck Personality Questionnaire Psychoticism Scale, the California Personality Inventory Socialization Scale and DSM-III Antisocial Personality Disorder. This is manifest both in terms of high intercorrelations between the measures of psychopathy and impulsivity and in their predictive relationship to the level of psychological distress suggesting a uniform impulsivity/psychopathy construct. Thus, the research supports a model of pathological gambling in which the severity of associated behavioural and psychological disturbance is mediated by a impulsivity/ psychopathy construct.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1997.tb03639.x

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 41 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. American Psychiatric Association, 1980, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: third edition
  2. American Psychiatric Association, 1994, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: fourth edition
  3. Blaszczynski A., 1988, Clinical Studies in Pathological Gambling
  4. Blaszczynski A. P., 1992, Pathological Gambling and Criminal Behaviour
  5. Cleckley H., 1976, The Mask of Sanity
  6. Eysenck S. B. G., 1975, Manual of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire
  7. Gough H. G., 1969, California Personality Inventory Manual
  8. Lesieur H. R., 1984, The Chase

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 366

Metadata

Authors
BLASZCZYNSKI, A., STEEL, Z., & McCONAGHY, N.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1997-01
Volume
92
Issue
1
Pages
75-87
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W1968155125
Cited by
367
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 20
FWCI
7.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Addiction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
impulsivity, gambling addiction, antisocial personality disorder, psychopathy, Eysenck Personality Questionnaire, California Personality Inventory, psychological distress, gambling severity, personality traits
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Female, Gambling, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Behavior, Addictive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review