Cited by 124Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research

The clinical significance of ‘small’ effects of smoking cessation treatments

Open access
WEST, ROBERT·2007·Addiction

Abstract

The clinical significance of 'small' effects of smoking cessation treatments

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01750.x

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A 24.4% quit rate for iCanQuit would yield a 20% higher impact compared to the 20.4% quit rate for QuitGuide; for every 25 adults who smoke, iCanQuit would result in one additional successful quitter compared to QuitGuide (number needed to treat = 25).

    “Furthermore, a 24.4% quit rate for iCanQuit would yield a 20% higher impact compared to the 20.4% quit rate for QuitGuide. For every 25 adults who smoke, iCanQuit would result in one additional successful quitter compared to QuitGuide (number needed to treat = 25) [84].”

    From Can an Acceptance and Commitment Therapy-Based Smartphone App Help Individuals with Mental Health Disorders Quit Smoking? (2024) · cites this paper as [84]

    The Background states that a 4-percentage-point increase in smoking abstinence corresponds to a number needed to treat of 25. It does not report the iCanQuit or QuitGuide quit rates or their claimed 20% relative difference, so it supports the NNT calculation but not the study-specific figures. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Tonstad S., Tonnesen P., Hajek P., Williams K. E., Billing C. B., Reeves K. R. Effect of maintenance therapy with vareni- cline on smoking cessation: a randamized controlled trial. JAMA 2006; 296: 64-71.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
WEST, R.
Affiliations
Cancer Research UK (GB)
Corresponding author
WEST, ROBERT
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-03-12
Volume
102
Issue
4
Pages
506-509
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W1562781150
Cited by
124
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Addiction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Keywords
smoking cessation, tobacco dependence treatment, small effect sizes, clinical significance
MeSH terms
Cost-Benefit Analysis, United Kingdom, Health Education, Health Promotion, Humans, Tobacco Use Disorder, Smoking Cessation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review