Cited by 224Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchBipolar Disorder and TreatmentSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Does cannabis use predict the first incidence of mood and anxiety disorders in the adult population?

Van Laar, Margriet, Van Dorsselaer, Saskia, Monshouwer, Karin, De Graaf, Ron·2007·Addiction

Abstract

Aims To investigate whether cannabis use predicted the first incidence of mood and anxiety disorders in adults during a 3‐year follow‐up period. Design and participants Data were derived from the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study (NEMESIS), a prospective study in the adult population of 18–64 years. The analysis was carried out on 3881 people who had no life‐time mood disorders and on 3854 people who had no life‐time anxiety disorders at baseline. Measurements Life‐time cannabis use and DSM‐III‐R mood and anxiety disorders, assessed with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). Findings After adjustment for strong confounders, any use of cannabis at baseline predicted a modest increase in the risk of a first major depression (odds ratio 1.62; 95% confidence interval 1.06–2.48) and a stronger increase in the risk of a first bipolar disorder (odds ratio 4.98; 95% confidence interval 1.80–13.81). The risk of ‘any mood disorder’ was elevated for weekly and almost daily users but not for less frequent use patterns. However, dose–response relationships were less clear for major depression and bipolar disorder separately. None of the associations between cannabis use and anxiety disorders remained significant after adjustment for confounders. Conclusions The associations between cannabis use and the first incidence of depression and bipolar disorder, which remained significant after adjustment for strong confounders, warrant research into the underlying mechanisms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01875.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van Laar, M., Van Dorsselaer, S., Monshouwer, K., & De Graaf, R.
Affiliations
Trimbos Institute (NL)
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-07-06
Volume
102
Issue
8
Pages
1251-1260
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W2113339435
Cited by
224
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 11
FWCI
5.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Addiction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
cannabis use, mood disorders, anxiety disorders, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, cannabis use patterns, dose-response relationship, Nemesis, prospective cohort
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Bipolar Disorder, Cannabis, Marijuana Abuse, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Prospective Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review