Cited by 176Opioid Use Disorder TreatmentSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesCriminal Justice and Corrections Analysis

A randomized clinical trial of methadone maintenance for prisoners: findings at 6 months post‐release

Open access
Gordon, Michael S., Kinlock, Timothy W., Schwartz, Robert P., O’Grady, Kevin E.·2008·Addiction

Abstract

Aims This study examined the effectiveness of methadone maintenance initiated prior to or just after release from prison at 6 months post‐release. Design A three‐group randomized controlled trial was conducted between September 2003 and June 2005. Setting A Baltimore pre‐release prison. Participants Two hundred and eleven adult pre‐release inmates who were heroin‐dependent during the year prior to incarceration. Intervention Participants were assigned randomly to the following: counseling only: counseling in prison, with passive referral to treatment upon release (n = 70); counseling + transfer: counseling in prison with transfer to methadone maintenance treatment upon release (n = 70); and counseling + methadone: methadone maintenance and counseling in prison, continued in a community‐based methadone maintenance program upon release (n = 71). Measurements Addiction Severity Index at study entry and follow‐up. Additional assessments at 6 months post‐release were treatment record review; urine drug testing for opioids, cocaine and other illicit drugs. Findings Counseling + methadone participants were significantly more likely than both counseling only and counseling + transfer participants to be retained in drug abuse treatment (P = 0.0001) and significantly less likely to have an opioid‐positive urine specimen compared to counseling only (P = 0.002). Furthermore, counseling + methadone participants reported significantly fewer days of involvement in self‐reported heroin use and criminal activity than counseling only participants. Conclusions Methadone maintenance, initiated prior to or immediately after release from prison, increases treatment entry and reduces heroin use at 6 months post‐release compared to counseling only. This intervention may be able to fill an urgent treatment need for prisoners with heroin addiction histories.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.002238.x

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Methadone and buprenorphine maintenance treatments are effective for opioid dependence in prison, jail, and community reentry settings.

    “Evidence-based opioid-agonist maintenance therapies for opioid dependence (methadone and buprenorphine) are effective in prison, jail, and community reentry (i.e., parole) settings2–5 but have historically been unavailable or discouraged among criminal justice clients.6–8”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [46]Kinlock TW Schwartz RP Gordon MS The significance of interagency collaboration in developing opioid agonist programs for inmates Corr Compend 2005 30 6 9 28 30

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gordon, M. S., Kinlock, T. W., Schwartz, R. P., & O’Grady, K. E.
Affiliations
  • Friends Research Institute (US)
  • Open Society Foundations (US)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Corresponding author
Gordon, Michael S.
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-07-15
Volume
103
Issue
8
Pages
1333-1342
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W2075214039
Cited by
176
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 8
FWCI
11.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Addiction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Open Society Institute
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA016237, R01DA16237)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Keywords
methadone maintenance treatment, heroin addiction, prisoners, post-release outcomes, treatment retention, opioid use, criminal activity, addiction treatment
MeSH terms
Adult, Counseling, Follow-Up Studies, Heroin Dependence, Humans, Male, Methadone, Middle Aged, Narcotics, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Prisoners, Baltimore, Substance Abuse Treatment Centers, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review