Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 181

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Adolescent cannabis users at 24 years: trajectories to regular weekly use and dependence in young adulthood

Swift, Wendy, Coffey, Carolyn, Carlin, John B., Degenhardt, Louisa, Patton, George C.·2008·Addiction

Abstract

Aims To examine the association between cannabis use by 18 years and problematic cannabis use at 24 years, considering possible mediating and confounding factors. Design Ten‐year representative prospective study with data from six time‐points in adolescence (mean age 14.9–17.4 years) and two in young adulthood (mean age 20.7 and 24.1 years) Setting Victoria, Australia. Participants Inception cohort of 1943 secondary school students (95.6% response rate), with 1520 (78% of adolescent participants) interviewed in the final wave. Measurements Participants reported frequency of cannabis use for the past 6 months at each time‐point in adolescence (age 14–17 years). Cannabis exposure was defined as: maximum frequency of use (occasional, weekly, daily), number of waves of use (1 or 2; 3–6) and first wave of use (early use: first waves 1–3). Young adult (24 years) outcomes were: weekly+ cannabis use and DSM‐IV cannabis dependence, referred to collectively as problematic use. Findings Of those interviewed at age 24 (wave 8), 34% had reported cannabis use in adolescence (waves 1–6), 12% at a level of weekly or more frequent use; 37% of these adolescent cannabis users were using at least weekly at wave 8, with 20% exhibiting dependence. Persistent adolescent cannabis and tobacco use as well as persistent mental health problems were associated strongly with problematic cannabis use at 24 years, after adjustment for potential confounding factors. Conclusions Heavy, persistent and early‐onset cannabis use were all strongly predictive of later cannabis problems. Even so, occasional use was not free of later problems. Where there was co‐occurring tobacco use or persistent mental health problems, risks for later problem cannabis use was higher.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02246.x

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 181

Metadata

Authors
Swift, W., Coffey, C., Carlin, J. B., Degenhardt, L., & Patton, G. C.
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-07-15
Volume
103
Issue
8
Pages
1361-1370
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W2035995947
Cited by
181
References
5
FWCI
6.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adolescent cannabis users at 24 years: trajectories to regular weekly use and dependence in young adulthood. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02246.x
The paper
Swift, W., Coffey, C., Carlin, J. B., Degenhardt, L., & Patton, G. C. (2008). Adolescent cannabis users at 24 years: trajectories to regular weekly use and dependence in young adulthood. Addiction. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02246.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.