Cited by 360Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPersonality Traits and PsychologyPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The role of personality dispositions to risky behavior in predicting first-year college drinking

Open access

Abstract

AIMS: US college student drinking is associated with enormous risks to health, safety and productivity. Recent advances in personality research that have delineated multiple, separate dispositions to engage in risky behaviors may help to clarify the personality contribution to risk for this problem. DESIGN: The authors compared the prospective roles of sensation seeking, lack of planning, lack of perseverance, negative urgency and positive urgency (dispositions to engage in rash action when in an unusually negative or positive mood, respectively) in predicting increases in drinking frequency, drinking quantity and negative outcomes from consumption across the first year of college. SETTING: University of Kentucky campus. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 418 first-year US college students enrolled in an Introduction to Psychology course during the first assessment; 293 participants completed both phases of the study. MEASUREMENTS: Participants completed self-report measures of personality and drinking behavior twice during the first year of college [the UPPS-R Impulsive Behavior Scale, positive urgency measure (PUM) and Drinking Styles Questionnaire (DSQ)]. FINDINGS: Whereas sensation seeking related to increases in the frequency with which college students drank alcohol, positive urgency predicted increases in (i) the quantity of alcohol students consumed at any given drinking episode and (ii) negative outcomes experienced from drinking. CONCLUSIONS: It appears that although sensation seeking is a risk factor for participation in drinking behaviors, risk for increased quantity of consumption and its negative outcomes may be more a function of dyscontrol stemming from high positive mood for college students.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02434.x

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 40 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Johnston L. D., 2002, National Survey Results on Drug Use from the Monitoring the Future Study, 1975–2000
  2. 10.1080/07448480009599305 · DOI
  3. Lindsay V., 2006, Factors that predict freshmen college student's preference to drink alcohol, J Alcohol Drug Educ, 50, 7
  4. Presley C. A., 1998, Alcohol and Drugs on American College Campuses: Use, Consequences, and Perceptions of the Campus Environment, Vol. IV. 1992–1994
  5. Presley C. A., 1996, Alcohol and Drugs on American College Campuses: Use, Consequences, and Perceptions of the Campus Environment, Vol. III. 1991–1993
  6. Presley C. A., 1998, Alcohol and Drugs on American College Campuses: A Report to College Presidents: Third in a Series, 1995, 1996, 1997

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 359

Metadata

Authors
Cyders, M. A., Flory, K., Rainer, S., & Smith, G. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Kentucky (US)
  • University of South Carolina (US)
  • Nova Southeastern University (US)
Corresponding author
Smith, Gregory T.
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-01-15
Volume
104
Issue
2
Pages
193-202
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W2143637634
Cited by
360
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 29
FWCI
17.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Addiction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01aa016166-05)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01-AA-016166, RO1 AA 016166, F31AA016265, AA016166)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
college drinking, first-year college students, personality dispositions, sensation seeking, positive urgency, negative urgency, impulsivity, lack of planning, lack of perseverance, drinking frequency, alcohol consumption quantity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Alcohol Drinking, Alcoholic Intoxication, Female, Humans, Kentucky, Male, Personality, Risk Factors, Students, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review