Cited by 1,193Gambling Behavior and TreatmentsSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Integration of impulsivity and positive mood to predict risky behavior: development and validation of a measure of positive urgency

Cyders, Melissa A., Smith, Gregory T., Spillane, Nichea S., Fischer, Sarah, Annus, Agnes M., Peterson, Claire·2007·Psychological Assessment

Abstract

In 3 studies, the authors developed and began to validate a measure of the propensity to act rashly in response to positive affective states (positive urgency). In Study 1, they developed a content-valid 14-item scale, showed that the measure was unidimensional, and showed that positive urgency was distinct from impulsivity-like constructs identified in 2 models of impulsive behavior. In Study 2, they showed that positive urgency explained variance in risky behavior not explained by measures of other impulsivity-like constructs, differentially explained positive mood-based risky behavior, differentiated individuals at risk for problem gambling from those not at risk, and interacted with drinking motives and expectancies as predicted to explain problem drinking behavior. In Study 3, they confirmed the hypothesis that positive urgency differentiated alcoholics from both eating-disordered and control individuals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/1040-3590.19.1.107

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cyders, M. A., Smith, G. T., Spillane, N. S., Fischer, S., Annus, A. M., & Peterson, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Kentucky (US)
  • University of Chicago Medical Center (US)
  • University of Dayton (US)
Venue
Psychological Assessment
Published
2007
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
107-118
ISSN
  • 1040-3590 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-134X
OpenAlex
W2025860484
Cited by
1,193
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 63 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 72 · 2021: 96 · 2020: 125 · 2019: 80 · 2018: 91 · 2017: 82 · 2016: 73 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 65 · 2013: 54 · 2012: 48
FWCI
20.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Assessment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
positive urgency, impulsivity, positive mood, risk-taking, problem gambling, problem drinking, drinking motives, alcohol expectancies, alcoholism, eating disorders, scale development, content validity, unidimensionality
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Alcohol Drinking, Alcoholism, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Gambling, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Assessment, Psychometrics, Reference Values, Risk-Taking, Set, Psychology, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review