Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 245

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Strength of urges to smoke as a measure of severity of cigarette dependence: comparison with the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence and its components

Fidler, Jennifer A, Shahab, Lion, West, Robert·2011·Addiction

Abstract

Aims Measuring the strength of urges to smoke during a normal smoking day among smokers in a culture where smoking is restricted could provide a good measure of the severity of cigarette dependence. An important criterion for a measure of cigarette dependence is how well it predicts failure of attempts to stop smoking. This study compared ratings of Strength of Urges to Smoke (SUTS) with the Fagerström Test of Nicotine Dependence (FTND) and its components, including the Heaviness of Smoking Index (HSI). Design A longitudinal study involving a household survey of a representative sample of adult smokers at baseline and 6‐month follow‐up by postal questionnaire. Setting England. Participants A total of 15 740 smokers aged 16 and over underwent the baseline interview; 2593 were followed‐up 6 months later, of whom 513 reported having made a quit attempt following the baseline survey but at least 1 month prior to the follow‐up. Measurements SUTS, FTND, HSI, cigarettes per day, time to first cigarette, age, social grade and gender were measured at baseline. Quit attempts since the baseline assessment and self‐reported abstinence were measured at 6‐month follow‐up. Findings In logistic regressions, all dependence measures predicted success of subsequent quit attempts, but SUTS had the strongest association (beta for SUTS, FTND and HSI: 0.41: P < 0.001, 0.13: P = 0.005, and 0.19: P = 0.003, respectively). In multiple logistic regressions when SUTS was entered as a predictor of abstinence, together with other dependence measures, it remained as the only predictive dependence measure. Conclusions A simple rating of strength of urges on a normal smoking day appears to be a good predictor of at least short‐term quit success in English smokers and as such may be a useful measure of cigarette addiction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03226.x

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. United States Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS), 1988, The Health Consequences of Smoking: Nicotine Addiction. A Report of the Surgeon General
  2. Royal College of Physicians, 2000, Nicotine Addiction in Britain. A Report of the Tobacco Advisory Group of the Royal College of Physicians
  3. Leatherdale S. T., 2009, Smoking cessation: intentions, attempts and techniques, Health Rep, 20, 31
  4. The NHS information Centre, Lifestyles Statistics, 2009, Statistics on Smoking: England, 2009
  5. 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00540.x · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/0376-8716(94)90158-9 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1080/14622200701673480 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.09.011 · DOI
  9. American Psychiatric Association, 1994, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
  10. 10.1038/sj.npp.1300030 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1037/0022-006X.72.2.139 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1080/1462220042000202481 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1016/j.addbeh.2009.12.013 · DOI
  14. 10.1080/14622200600672765 · DOI · Paper page
  15. International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2008, Methods for Evaluating Tobacco Control Policies
  16. 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02841.x · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.03.009 · DOI
  18. 10.1007/s00213-004-1923-6 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1080/14622200020032051 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1080/713688158 · DOI
  21. 10.1037/1064-1297.7.4.354 · doi:10.1037/1064-1297.7.4.354 · Paper page
  22. 10.1007/s00213-009-1742-x · DOI
  23. 10.1183/09059180.00011005 · DOI
  24. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0679 · DOI
  25. 10.1136/jech.56.3.167 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1080/1462220021000032717 · DOI

Cited by

See all 245

Metadata

Authors
Fidler, J. A., Shahab, L., & West, R.
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-12-06
Volume
106
Issue
3
Pages
631-638
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W2117741074
Cited by
245
References
8
FWCI
8.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Strength of urges to smoke as a measure of severity of cigarette dependence: comparison with the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence and its components. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03226.x
The paper
Fidler, J. A., Shahab, L., & West, R. (2011). Strength of urges to smoke as a measure of severity of cigarette dependence: comparison with the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence and its components. Addiction. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03226.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.