The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fungal effector proteins: past, present and future
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY: The pioneering research of Harold Flor on flax and the flax rust fungus culminated in his gene‐for‐gene hypothesis. It took nearly 50 years before the first fungal avirulence ( Avr ) gene in support of his hypothesis was cloned. Initially, fungal Avr genes were identified by reverse genetics and map‐based cloning from model organisms, but, currently, the availability of many sequenced fungal genomes allows their cloning from additional fungi by a combination of comparative and functional genomics. It is believed that most Avr genes encode effectors that facilitate virulence by suppressing pathogen‐associated molecular pattern‐triggered immunity and induce effector‐triggered immunity in plants containing cognate resistance proteins. In resistant plants, effectors are directly or indirectly recognized by cognate resistance proteins that reside either on the plasma membrane or inside the plant cell. Indirect recognition of an effector (also known as the guard model) implies that the virulence target of an effector in the host (the guardee) is guarded by the resistance protein (the guard) that senses manipulation of the guardee, leading to activation of effector‐triggered immunity. In this article, we review the literature on fungal effectors and some pathogen‐associated molecular patterns, including those of some fungi for which no gene‐for‐gene relationship has been established.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jones, J. D. G., & Dangl, J. L. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05286 · Cited by 13,177
Shen, Q.-H., Saijo, Y., Mauch, S., Biskup, C., Bieri, S., Keller, B., Seki, H., Ülker, B., Somssich, I. E., & Schulze-Lefert, P. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1136372 · Cited by 751
The capsular dynamics of Cryptococcus neoformans
McFadden, D., Zaragoza, O., & Casadevall, A. (2006) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2006.09.003 · Cited by 93
Cited by
Marshall, R., Kombrink, A., Motteram, J., Loza-Reyes, E., Lucas, J., Hammond-Kosack, K. E., Thomma, B. P. H. J., & Rudd, J. J. (2011) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.111.176347 · Cited by 332
Rudd, J. J., Kanyuka, K., Hassani-Pak, K., Derbyshire, M., Andongabo, A., Devonshire, J., Lysenko, A., Saqi, M., Desai, N. M., Powers, S. J., et al. (2015) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.114.255927 · Cited by 302
Liu, Z., Zhang, Z., Faris, J. D., Oliver, R. P., Syme, R., McDonald, M. C., McDonald, B. A., Solomon, P. S., Lu, S., Shelver, W. L., et al. (2012) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1002467 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- DE WIT, P. J. G. M., MEHRABI, R., VAN DEN BURG, H. A., & STERGIOPOULOS, I.
- Venue
- Molecular Plant Pathology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-10-21
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 735-747
- ISSN
- 1364-3703 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-6722
- OpenAlex
- W2042939732
- Cited by
- 365
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 26.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fungal effector proteins: past, present and future. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1364-3703.2009.00591.x
- The paper
- DE WIT, P. J. G. M., MEHRABI, R., VAN DEN BURG, H. A., & STERGIOPOULOS, I. (2009). Fungal effector proteins: past, present and future. Molecular Plant Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1364-3703.2009.00591.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.