Cited by 192

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Review article: current treatment options and management of functional dyspepsia

Lacy, B. E., Talley, N. J., Locke, G. R., Bouras, E. P., DiBaise, J. K., El‐Serag, H. B., Abraham, B. P., Howden, C. W., Moayyedi, P., Prather, C.·2012·Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Abstract

Summary: Background: Functional dyspepsia (FD), a common functional gastrointestinal disorder, is defined by the R ome III criteria as symptoms of epigastric pain or discomfort (prevalence in FD of 89–90%), postprandial fullness (75–88%), and early satiety (50–82%) within the last 3 months with symptom onset at least 6 months earlier. Patients cannot have any evidence of structural disease to explain symptoms and predominant symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux are exclusionary. Symptoms of FD are non‐specific and the pathophysiology is diverse, which explains in part why a universally effective treatment for FD remains elusive. Aim: To present current management options for the treatment of FD (therapeutic gain/response rate noted when available). Results: The utility of H elicobacter pylori eradication for the treatment of FD is modest (6–14% therapeutic gain), while the therapeutic efficacy of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) (7–10% therapeutic gain), histamine‐type‐2‐receptor antagonists (8–35% therapeutic gain), prokinetic agents (18–45%), tricyclic antidepressants (TCA) (response rates of 64–70%), serotonin reuptake inhibitors (no better than placebo) is limited and hampered by inadequate data. This review discusses dietary interventions and analyses studies involving complementary and alternative medications, and psychological therapies. Conclusions: A reasonable treatment approach based on current evidence is to initiate therapy with a daily PPI in H. pylori‐negative FD patients. If symptoms persist, a therapeutic trial with a tricyclic antidepressant may be initiated. If symptoms continue, the clinician can possibly initiate therapy with an anti‐nociceptive agent, a prokinetic agent, or some form of complementary and alternative medications, although evidence from prospective studies to support this approach is limited.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2012.05128.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evidence from RCTs suggests that the efficacy of PPIs in FD may be confined to those people who have coexisting reflux symptoms.

    “Evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) suggests that the efficacy of PPIs in FD may be confined to those people who have coexisting reflux symptoms (Lacy 2012).”

    From Proton pump inhibitors for functional dyspepsia (2017) · cites this paper as Lacy 2012

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 94

  1. 10.1016/S1542-3565(05)00153-9 · DOI
  2. 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.01897.x · DOI
  3. 10.1136/gut.2006.099846 · DOI
  4. 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.11.059 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01381.x · DOI
  6. 10.1136/gut.2007.137125 · DOI
  7. 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.05.030 · DOI
  8. 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.09.020 · DOI
  9. 10.1001/jama.2007.51-a · DOI
  10. 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01706.x · DOI
  11. Moayyedi P, 2002, Clinical and economic consequences of dyspepsia in the community, Gut, 50, 10, 10.1136/gut.50.suppl_4.iv10 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.cgh.2010.03.003 · DOI
  13. Matsueda K, 2011, A placebo‐controlled trial of acotiamide for meal‐related symptoms of functional dyspepsia, Gut
  14. 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2009.01262.x · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.cgh.2008.09.007 · DOI
  16. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.00288.x · DOI
  17. 10.1007/BF02212683 · DOI
  18. 10.1136/gut.48.3.347 · DOI
  19. Cuperus P, 1996, Eating patterns in functional dyspepsia: a case control study, Eur J Clin Nutr, 50, 520
  20. 10.1007/s10620-008-0698-8 · DOI
  21. 10.1053/gast.2002.33663 · DOI
  22. Moayyedi P, 2008, Eradication of Helicobacter pylori for non‐ulcer dyspepsia, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2, CD002096
  23. Lan L, 2011, Symptom‐based tendencies of Helicobacter Pylori eradication in patients with functional dyspepsia, World J Gastroenterol, 17, 3242
  24. 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.533 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.bpg.2004.04.003 · DOI
  26. Moayyedi P, 2006, Pharmacological interventions for non‐ulcer dyspepsia, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 4, CD001960
  27. 10.1136/gut.47.4.473 · DOI
  28. Delattre M, 1985, Symptomatic treatment of nonulcer dyspepsia with cimetidine, Curr Therapeutic Res, 37, 980
  29. 10.3109/00365528809093840 · DOI
  30. Hadi S, 1989, Clinical investigation of ranitidine in patients with gastritis, Clin Ther, 11, 590
  31. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1998.00368.x · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02470.x · DOI
  33. Kelbaek H, 1985, Controlled clinical trial of treatment with cimetidine for non‐ulcer dyspepsia, Acta Med Scand, 213, 281, 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1985.tb02696.x · DOI
  34. Muller P, 1994, Ranitidine in the Treatment of Non‐Ulcer Dyspepsia. A placebo‐controlled study in the Federal Republic of Germany [Ranitidin in der Behandlung derNon–Ulcer–Dyspepsie. Eine placebo–kontrollierte Studie in der Bundesrepublic Deutschland], Arzneimittelforschung/Drug Res, 10, 1130
  35. 10.3109/00365528509089708 · DOI
  36. 10.3109/00365528609093787 · DOI
  37. Saunders JH, 1994, Dyspepsia: incidence of a non‐ulcer disease in a controlled trial of ranitidine in general practice, Br Med J (Clin Res Ed), 1986, 665
  38. 10.1185/03007998909110140 · DOI
  39. Carvalhinhos A, 1995, Cisapride compared with ranitidine in the treatment of functional dyspepsia, Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 7, 411
  40. Casiraghi A, 1986, Cimetidine vs antacids in non‐ulcer dyspepsia, Curr Ther Res Clin Exp, 39, 397
  41. Misra SP, 1992, Sucralfate versus ranitidine in non‐ulcer dyspepsia: results of a prospective, randomized, open, controlled trial, Indian J Gastroenterol, 11, 7
  42. 10.1046/j.1365-2036.1998.00410.x · DOI
  43. 10.1136/gut.47.4.473 · DOI
  44. 10.1080/003655202762671260 · DOI
  45. 10.1136/gut.51.4.502 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.01.008 · DOI
  47. 10.1185/03007990802184545 · DOI
  48. 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03410.x · DOI
  49. 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.09.012 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Vakil N, 2008, Tegaserod treatment for dysmotility‐like functional dyspepsia: results of two randomized, controlled trials, Am J Gastroenterol, 103, 1906
  51. 10.1056/NEJMoa052639 · DOI
  52. 10.1136/gut.2007.132449 · DOI
  53. 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2002.01236.x · DOI
  54. 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2000.00868.x · DOI
  55. 10.1517/13543784.2010.482927 · DOI
  56. 10.1358/dot.2009.45.12.1423115 · DOI
  57. 10.1002/14651858.CD005454.pub2 · DOI
  58. 10.1586/egh.09.73 · DOI
  59. 10.1159/000088363 · DOI
  60. 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2007.01029.x · DOI
  61. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.02021.x · DOI
  62. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1998.00160.x · DOI · Paper page
  63. 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02473.x · DOI
  64. Wu JC, 2011, A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial of low dose imipramine for treatment of refractory functional dyspepsia (FD), Gastroenterology, 140, S‐50
  65. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07699.x · DOI · Paper page
  66. 10.1053/gast.2001.27180 · DOI
  67. 10.1016/j.cgh.2008.02.051 · DOI
  68. 10.1002/hup.1038 · DOI
  69. 10.1016/j.cct.2012.02.002 · DOI
  70. 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2009.01261.x · DOI
  71. 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2009.01449.x · DOI
  72. 10.3389/fphar.2011.00028 · DOI
  73. 10.1097/YIC.0b013e3283249c7b · DOI
  74. 10.1001/jama.280.18.1569 · DOI
  75. Barnes PM, 2004, Complementary and Alternative Medicine use Among Adults: United States, 2002
  76. 10.1159/000076546 · DOI
  77. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.01183.x · DOI
  78. 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2008.01249.x · DOI
  79. 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01767.x · DOI
  80. 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2000.00873.x · DOI
  81. 10.1016/0140-6736(90)90402-Q · DOI
  82. 10.1016/j.phymed.2008.04.004 · DOI
  83. 10.1080/16506078809456271 · DOI
  84. 10.1016/0022-3999(94)90026-4 · DOI
  85. 10.1053/gast.2000.16493 · DOI
  86. 10.1053/gast.2002.37071 · DOI
  87. 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.03005.x · DOI
  88. 10.1016/S0306-4522(02)00170-7 · DOI
  89. 10.1016/S0304-3959(98)00175-4 · DOI
  90. 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.01922.x · DOI
  91. 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03676.x · DOI
  92. 10.1210/jc.2005-2638 · DOI · Paper page
  93. 10.1136/gut.2005.069088 · DOI
  94. 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.03986.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lacy, B. E., Talley, N. J., Locke, G. R., Bouras, E. P., DiBaise, J. K., El‐Serag, H. B., Abraham, B. P., Howden, C. W., Moayyedi, P., & Prather, C.
Affiliations
  • Dartmouth‐Hitchcock Medical Center Lebanon NH USA
  • University of Newcastle Callaghan New South Wales Australia
  • Mayo Clinic Rochester MN USA
  • Mayo Clinic Jacksonville FL USA
  • Mayo Clinic Scottsdale AZ USA
  • Baylor College of Medicine Houston TX USA
  • Northwestern University Chicago IL USA
  • McMaster University Medical Center Hamilton Ontario Canada
  • St. Louis University St. Louis MO USA
Venue
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-05-16
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
3-15
ISSN
  • 0269-2813
  • 1365-2036
Cited by
192
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review