Cited by 239Gastrointestinal motility and disordersInfant Health and DevelopmentGut microbiota and health

Overlapping upper and lower gastrointestinal symptoms in irritable bowel syndrome patients with constipation or diarrhea

Talley, Nicholas J., Dennis, Eslie Helen, Schettler-Duncan, V. Ann, Lacy, Brian E., Olden, Kevin W., Crowell, Michael D.·2003·The American Journal of Gastroenterology

Abstract

Objectives Distinguishing between irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and functional dyspepsia can be challenging because of the variations in symptom patterns, which commonly overlap. However, the overlap is poorly quantified, and it is equally uncertain whether symptom patterns differ in subgroups of IBS arbitrarily defined by primary bowel patterns of constipation (IBS-C) and diarrhea (IBS-D). We aimed to determine and to compare the distribution of GI symptoms, both, upper and lower, among IBS-C and IBS-D patients. Methods A total of 121 consecutive patients presenting with a diagnosis of IBS were grouped according to primary bowel symptoms as IBS-C (58 women and 18 men, mean age 47 +/- 17 yr) or IBS-D (26 women and 19 men, mean age 47 +/- 15 yr). The Hopkins Bowel Symptom Questionnaire, which includes a brief Quality of Life assessment, and the Hopkins Symptom Checklist 90-Revised were completed by all patients at intake. Results IBS-C patients reported significantly more overall GI symptoms when compared to patients with IBS-D (6.67 vs 4.62, respectively, p Conclusions Upper GI symptoms consistent with functional dyspepsia were more frequent in IBS-C. Although there was considerable overlap of upper and lower GI symptoms in patients with IBS-C and IBS-D, the former had more frequent lower abdominal pain and bloating.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07699.x

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Talley, N. J., Dennis, E. H., Schettler-Duncan, V. A., Lacy, B. E., Olden, K. W., & Crowell, M. D.
Affiliations
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US)
Venue
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2003-11
Volume
98
Issue
11
Pages
2454-2459
ISSN
  • 0002-9270 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-0241
OpenAlex
W2065349462
Cited by
239
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 15
FWCI
8.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Infant Health and Development
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
Keywords
irritable bowel syndrome, irritable bowel syndrome with constipation, diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome, functional dyspepsia, upper gastrointestinal symptoms, lower gastrointestinal symptoms, abdominal pain, bloating, symptom overlap, somatization, quality of life, personality
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Constipation, Diarrhea, Dyspepsia, Female, Gastroesophageal Reflux, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Participation, Prognosis, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Cohort Studies, Comorbidity, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution, Risk Assessment, Irritable Bowel Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review