The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prebiotics in aquaculture: a review
Open accessAbstract
A prebiotic is a non-digestible food ingredient that beneficially affects the host by selectively stimulating the growth and/or the activity of one or a limited number of bacteria in the colon. Despite the potential benefits to health and performance as noted in various terrestrial animals, the use of prebiotics in the farming of fish and shellfish has been less investigated. The studies of prebiotics in fish and shellfish have investigated the following parameters: effect on growth, feed conversion, gut microbiota, cell damage/morphology, resistance against pathogenic bacteria and innate immune parameters such as alternative complement activity (ACH50), lysozyme activity, natural haemagglutination activity, respiratory burst, superoxide dismutase activity and phagocytic activity. This review discusses the results from these studies and the methods used. If the use of prebiotics leads to health responses becoming more clearly manifested in fish and shellfish, then prebiotics might have the potential to increase the efficiency and sustainability of aquaculture production. However, large gaps of knowledge exist. To fully conclude on the effects of adding prebiotics in fish diets, more research efforts are needed to provide the aquaculture industry, the scientific community, the regulatory bodies and the general public with the necessary information and tools.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Genes and Molecules of Lactobacilli Supporting Probiotic Action
Lebeer, S., Vanderleyden, J., & De Keersmaecker, S. C. J. (2008) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00017-08 · Cited by 1,013
Nondigestible Oligosaccharides
Roberfroid, M., & Slavin, J. (2000) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408690091189239 · Cited by 323
New insight into butyrate metabolism
Knudsen, K. E. B., Serena, A., Canibe, N., & Juntunen, K. S. (2003) · Proceedings of the Nutrition Society · doi:10.1079/pns2002212 · Cited by 134
Cited by
Role of gastrointestinal microbiota in fish
Nayak, S. K. (2010) · Aquaculture Research · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2109.2010.02546.x · Cited by 1,073
Beneficial roles of feed additives as immunostimulants in aquaculture: a review
Dawood, M. A. O., Koshio, S., & Esteban, M. Á. (2018) · Reviews in Aquaculture · doi:10.1111/raq.12209 · Cited by 921
Llewellyn, M. S., Boutin, S., Hoseinifar, S. H., & Derome, N. (2014) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2014.00207 · Cited by 745
A new view of the fish gut microbiome: advances from next-generation sequencing
Ghanbari, M., Kneifel, W., & Domig, K. J. (2015) · Aquaculture · doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2015.06.033 · Cited by 669
Recent advances in the role of probiotics and prebiotics in carp aquaculture: A review
Dawood, M. A. O., & Koshio, S. (2016) · Aquaculture · doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2015.12.033 · Cited by 527
Metadata
- Authors
- RINGØ, E., OLSEN, R. E., GIFSTAD, T. Ø., DALMO, R. A., AMLUND, H., HEMRE, G.-I., & BAKKE, A. M.
- Venue
- Aquaculture Nutrition
- Publisher
- Hindawi Limited
- Published
- 2010-04
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 117-136
- ISSN
- 1353-5773 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2095
- OpenAlex
- W2058025271
- Cited by
- 742
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 12.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prebiotics in aquaculture: a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2095.2009.00731.x
- The paper
- RINGØ, E., OLSEN, R. E., GIFSTAD, T. Ø., DALMO, R. A., AMLUND, H., HEMRE, G.-I., & BAKKE, A. M. (2010). Prebiotics in aquaculture: a review. Aquaculture Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2095.2009.00731.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.