The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Marine microalgae from biorefinery as a potential feed protein source for Atlantic salmon, common carp and whiteleg shrimp
Open accessAbstract
Two marine algal products MAP3 and MAP8 were examined for their suitability as fishmeal protein substitutes in feeds of three prominent farmed species, through short-term feeding studies. Algal meals were tested at 5 and 10% protein replacement levels for Atlantic salmon and at 25 and 40% for common carp and whiteleg shrimp. At the end of the 12-week period, the growth and feed performance of the two fish species did not reveal any significant difference between those fish offered the algae-based feed and those offered the control feed. The whole body proximate compositions of Atlantic salmon fed the control and algae-based feeds were not significantly different. In common carp, the lipid content in the fish fed higher level of MAP3 was significantly lower than that of the fish fed the control feed. In whiteleg shrimp, at the end of the 9-week feeding period, growth performance and feed utilization did not differ between the treatment groups. Protein content in the shrimp fed the higher level of MAP8 was significantly lower than that of shrimp on the control feed. The three species could accept the algal meals in their feeds at the tested levels, though there were some noticeable effects on body composition at higher inclusion levels.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A RAPID METHOD OF TOTAL LIPID EXTRACTION AND PURIFICATION
Bligh, E. G., & Dyer, W. J. (1959) · Canadian Journal of Biochemistry and Physiology · doi:10.1139/o59-099 · Cited by 54,751
Brennan, L., & Owende, P. (2010) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2009.10.009 · Cited by 4,894
Spirulina as a nutrient source in diets for growing sturgeon (Acipenser baeri)
Palmegiano, G. B., Agradi, E., Forneris, G., Gai, F., Gasco, L., Rigamonti, E., Sicuro, B., & Zoccarato, I. (2005) · Aquaculture Research · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2109.2005.01209.x · Cited by 138
Cited by
The Future of Aquatic Protein: Implications for Protein Sources in Aquaculture Diets
Hua, K., Cobcroft, J. M., Cole, A., Condon, K., Jerry, D. R., Mangott, A., Praeger, C., Vucko, M. J., Zeng, C., Zenger, K., et al. (2019) · One Earth · doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2019.10.018 · Cited by 851
Microalgae in aquafeeds for a sustainable aquaculture industry
Shah, M. R., Lutzu, G. A., Alam, A., Sarker, P., Kabir Chowdhury, M. A., Parsaeimehr, A., Liang, Y., & Daroch, M. (2018) · Journal of Applied Phycology · doi:10.1007/s10811-017-1234-z · Cited by 463
Camacho, F., Macedo, A., & Malcata, F. (2019) · Marine Drugs · doi:10.3390/md17060312 · Cited by 409
Fabris, M., Abbriano, R. M., Pernice, M., Sutherland, D. L., Commault, A. S., Hall, C. C., Labeeuw, L., McCauley, J. I., Kuzhiuparambil, U., Ray, P., et al. (2020) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.00279 · Cited by 382
Recent advances in single cell protein use as a feed ingredient in aquaculture
Jones, S. W., Karpol, A., Friedman, S., Maru, B. T., & Tracy, B. P. (2020) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2019.12.026 · Cited by 353
Metadata
- Authors
- Kiron, V., Phromkunthong, W., Huntley, M., Archibald, I., & Scheemaker, G.
- Venue
- Aquaculture Nutrition
- Publisher
- Hindawi Limited
- Published
- 2012-04-03
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 521-531
- ISSN
- 1353-5773 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2035208738
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 11.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Marine microalgae from biorefinery as a potential feed protein source for Atlantic salmon, common carp and whiteleg shrimp. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2095.2011.00923.x
- The paper
- Kiron, V., Phromkunthong, W., Huntley, M., Archibald, I., & Scheemaker, G. (2012). Marine microalgae from biorefinery as a potential feed protein source for Atlantic salmon, common carp and whiteleg shrimp. Aquaculture Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2095.2011.00923.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
