The DOI matches its Crossref record; 152 of the 152 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Future of Aquatic Protein: Implications for Protein Sources in Aquaculture Diets
Open accessAbstract
Approximately 70% of the aquatic-based production of animals is fed aquaculture, whereby animals are provided with high-protein aquafeeds.Currently, aquafeeds are reliant on fish meal and fish oil sourced from wild-captured forage fish.However, increasing use of forage fish is unsustainable and, because an additional 37.4 million tons of aquafeeds will be required by 2025, alternative protein sources are needed.Beyond plantbased ingredients, fishery and aquaculture byproducts and insect meals have the greatest potential to supply the protein required by aquafeeds over the next 10-20 years.Food waste also has potential through the biotransformation and/or bioconversion of raw waste materials, whereas microbial and macroalgal biomass have limitations regarding their scalability and protein content, respectively.In this review, we describe the considerable scope for improved efficiency in fed aquaculture and discuss the development and optimization of alternative protein sources for aquafeeds to ensure a socially and environmentally sustainable future for the aquaculture industry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prediction of Total Genetic Value Using Genome-Wide Dense Marker Maps
Meuwissen, T. H. E., Hayes, B. J., & Goddard, M. E. (2001) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/157.4.1819 · Cited by 7,917
Effect of aquaculture on world fish supplies.
Naylor, R. L., Goldburg, R. J., Primavera, J. H., Kautsky, N., Beveridge, M. C. M., Clay, J., Folke, C., Lubchenco, J., Mooney, H., & Troell, M. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35016500 · Cited by 3,063
Micro-algae as a source of protein
Becker, E. W. (2007) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2006.11.002 · Cited by 2,311
Expanding the utilization of sustainable plant products in aquafeeds: a review
Gatlin, D. M., Barrows, F. T., Brown, P., Dabrowski, K., Gaylord, T. G., Hardy, R. W., Herman, E., Hu, G., Krogdahl, Å., Nelson, R., et al. (2007) · Aquaculture Research · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2109.2007.01704.x · Cited by 2,250
Bioactive compounds in seaweed: functional food applications and legislation
Holdt, S. L., & Kraan, S. (2011) · Journal of Applied Phycology · doi:10.1007/s10811-010-9632-5 · Cited by 2,135
Tacon, A. G. J., & Metian, M. (2008) · Aquaculture · doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.08.015 · Cited by 2,104
State of the art on use of insects as animal feed.
Makkar, H. P. S., Tran, G., Heuzé, V., & Ankers, P. (2014) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.07.008 · Cited by 1,846
Algae as nutritional and functional food sources: revisiting our understanding.
Wells, M. L., Potin, P., Craigie, J. S., Raven, J. A., Merchant, S. S., Helliwell, K. E., Smith, A. G., Camire, M. E., & Brawley, S. H. (2017) · Journal of Applied Phycology · doi:10.1007/s10811-016-0974-5 · Cited by 1,562
Feeding aquaculture in an era of finite resources
Naylor, R. L., Hardy, R. W., Bureau, D. P., Chiu, A., Elliott, M., Farrell, A. P., Forster, I., Gatlin, D. M., Goldburg, R. J., Hua, K., et al. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0905235106 · Cited by 1,514
Self-citationDivision, U. P. (1991) · Cited by 1,434
Cited by
The contribution of aquaculture systems to global aquaculture production
Verdegem, M., Buschmann, A. H., Latt, U. W., Dalsgaard, A. J. T., & Lovatelli, A. (2023) · Journal of the World Aquaculture Society · doi:10.1111/jwas.12963 · Cited by 322
Global adoption of novel aquaculture feeds could substantially reduce forage fish demand by 2030
Cottrell, R. S., Blanchard, J. L., Halpern, B. S., Metian, M., & Froehlich, H. E. (2020) · Nature Food · doi:10.1038/s43016-020-0078-x · Cited by 285
Collagen Derived from Fish Industry Waste: Progresses and Challenges
Rajabimashhadi, Z., Gallo, N., Salvatore, L., & Lionetto, F. (2023) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym15030544 · Cited by 192
Awasthi, M. K., Ferreira, J. A., Sirohi, R., Sarsaiya, S., Khoshnevisan, B., Baladi, S., Sindhu, R., Binod, P., Pandey, A., Juneja, A., et al. (2021) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.110972 · Cited by 112
Metadata
- Authors
- Hua, K., Cobcroft, J. M., Cole, A., Condon, K., Jerry, D. R., Mangott, A., Praeger, C., Vucko, M. J., Zeng, C., Zenger, K., & Strugnell, J. M.
- Venue
- One Earth
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-11
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 316-329
- ISSN
- 2590-3322 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2991088874
- Cited by
- 851
- References
- 152
- FWCI
- 63.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Future of Aquatic Protein: Implications for Protein Sources in Aquaculture Diets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.oneear.2019.10.018
- The paper
- Hua, K., Cobcroft, J. M., Cole, A., Condon, K., Jerry, D. R., Mangott, A., Praeger, C., Vucko, M. J., Zeng, C., Zenger, K., & Strugnell, J. M. (2019). The Future of Aquatic Protein: Implications for Protein Sources in Aquaculture Diets. One Earth. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2019.10.018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
