The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A dose‐ranging study of the pharmacokinetics of hydroxy‐chloroquine following intravenous administration to healthy volunteers.
Open accessAbstract
1. The pharmacokinetics of hydroxychloroquine were studied in five healthy volunteers following an intravenous infusion of 155 mg (2.47 +/‐ 0.25 mg kg‐1) racemic hydroxychloroquine. Four of these volunteers also received a further 310 mg (4.92 +/‐ 0.45 mg kg‐1) infusion of hydroxychloroquine and evidence of nonlinearities in the pharmacokinetics of hydroxychloroquine were sought. 2. No nonlinear elimination or distribution processes appeared to be operating at the doses of hydroxychloroquine used in this study, supporting the hypothesis that in the therapeutic dosing range the pharmacokinetics of hydroxychloroquine are linear. 3. Half‐life and mean residence time were long (around 40 days) and large volumes of distribution were calculated (5,522 l from blood, 44,257 l from plasma). Sequestration into the tissues is an important feature of the disposition of hydroxychloroquine. The persistence of hydroxychloroquine in the body is due primarily to this extensive tissue distribution, rather than to low clearance (667 ml min‐1 based on plasma data, 96 ml min‐1 based on blood data). 4. Plasma data were more variable than blood data. Blood to plasma concentration ratios were not constant (mean +/‐ s.d.: 7.2 +/‐ 4.2). The data indicate that it is preferable to measure whole blood concentrations of hydroxychloroquine, rather than plasma concentrations, in pharmacokinetic studies. 5. The pharmacokinetics of hydroxychloroquine are similar to those of chloroquine.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Yao, X., Ye, F., Zhang, M., Cui, C., Huang, B., Niu, P., Liu, X., Zhao, L., Dong, E., Song, C., et al. (2020) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa237 · Cited by 2,662
World Health Organization (2000) · Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · doi:10.1016/s0035-9203(00)90300-6 · Cited by 1,085
(1991) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199101173240303 · Cited by 677
Kaptein, S. J. F., Jacobs, S., Langendries, L., Seldeslachts, L., ter Horst, S., Liesenborghs, L., Hens, B., Vergote, V., Heylen, E., Barthelemy, K., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2014441117 · Cited by 269
Carlsson, H., Hjorton, K., Abujrais, S., Rönnblom, L., Åkerfeldt, T., & Kultima, K. (2020) · Arthritis Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13075-020-02211-1 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Tett, S., Cutler, D., Day, R., & Brown, K.
- Venue
- British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1988-09
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 303-313
- ISSN
- 0306-5251 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2125
- OpenAlex
- W2031026401
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A dose‐ranging study of the pharmacokinetics of hydroxy‐chloroquine following intravenous administration to healthy volunteers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2125.1988.tb05281.x
- The paper
- Tett, S., Cutler, D., Day, R., & Brown, K. (1988). A dose‐ranging study of the pharmacokinetics of hydroxy‐chloroquine following intravenous administration to healthy volunteers. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.1988.tb05281.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.