The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What is the best size descriptor to use for pharmacokinetic studies in the obese?
Open accessAbstract
The prevalence of obesity in the western world is dramatically rising, with many of these individuals requiring therapeutic intervention for a variety of disease states. Despite the growing prevalence of obesity there is a paucity of information describing how doses should be adjusted, or indeed whether they need to be adjusted, in the clinical setting. This review is aimed at identifying which descriptors of body size provide the most information about the relationship between dose and concentration in the obese. The size descriptors, weight, lean body weight, ideal body weight, body surface area, body mass index, fat‐free mass, percent ideal body weight, adjusted body weight and predicted normal body weight were considered as potential size descriptors. We conducted an extensive review of the literature to identify studies that have assessed the quantitative relationship between the parameters clearance (CL) and volume of distribution (V) and these descriptors of body size. Surprisingly few studies have addressed the relationship between obesity and CL or V in a quantitative manner. Despite the lack of studies there were consistent findings: (i) most studies found total body weight to be the best descriptor of V. A further analysis of the studies that have addressed V found that total body weight or another descriptor that incorporated fat mass was the preferred descriptor for drugs that have high lipophilicity; (ii) in contrast, CL was best described by lean body mass and no apparent relationship between lipophilicity or clearance mechanism and preference for body size descriptor was found. In conclusion, no single descriptor described the influence of body size on both CL and V equally well. For drugs that are dosed chronically, and therefore CL is of primary concern, dosing for obese patients should not be based on their total weight. If a weight‐based dose individualization is required then we would suggest that chronic drug dosing in the obese subject should be based on lean body weight, at least until a more robust size descriptor becomes available.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prediction of Creatinine Clearance from Serum Creatinine
Cockcroft, D. W., & Gault, H. (1976) · Nephron · doi:10.1159/000180580 · Cited by 15,309
(2000) · PubMed · Cited by 13,173
(1998) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e565682010-001 · Cited by 9,472
The metabolic phenotype in obesity: Fat mass, body fat distribution, and adipose tissue function
Goossens, G. H. (2017) · Obesity Facts · doi:10.1159/000471488 · Cited by 8,481
A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known. 1916.
Bois, D. D., & Bois, E. F. D. (1989) · PubMed · Cited by 5,303
Kopelman, P. G. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35007508 · Cited by 4,795
Du BOIS, D. (1916) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.1916.00080130010002 · Cited by 4,342
Simplified calculation of body surface area
(1987) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198710223171717 · Cited by 3,238
Indices of relative weight and obesity
Keys, A., Fidanza, F., Karvonen, M. J., Kimura, N., & Taylor, H. L. (1972) · Journal of Chronic Diseases · doi:10.1016/0021-9681(72)90027-6 · Cited by 2,055
The assessment of the amount of fat in the human body from measurements of skinfold thickness
Durnin, J. V. G. A., & Rahaman, M. M. (1967) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn19670070 · Cited by 1,685
Cited by
Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propofol
Sahinovic, M. M., Struys, M. M. R. F., & Absalom, A. R. (2018) · Clinical Pharmacokinetics · doi:10.1007/s40262-018-0672-3 · Cited by 809
Effect of Obesity on the Pharmacokinetics of Drugs in Humans
Hanley, M. J., Abernethy, D. R., & Greenblatt, D. J. (2010) · Clinical Pharmacokinetics · doi:10.2165/11318100-000000000-00000 · Cited by 773
Impact of Obesity on Drug Metabolism and Elimination in Adults and Children
Brill, M. J. E., Diepstraten, J., van Rongen, A., van Kralingen, S., van den Anker, J. N., & Knibbe, C. A. J. (2012) · Clinical Pharmacokinetics · doi:10.2165/11599410-000000000-00000 · Cited by 382
Drug–Nutrient Interactions: A Broad View with Implications for Practice
Boullata, J. I., & Hudson, L. M. (2012) · Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics · doi:10.1016/j.jada.2011.09.002 · Cited by 138
Della Torre, M., Hibbard, J. U., Jeong, H., & Fischer, J. H. (2010) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2010.06.029 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Green, B., & Duffull, S. B.
- Venue
- British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-06-25
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 119-133
- ISSN
- 0306-5251 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2125
- OpenAlex
- W2078501925
- Cited by
- 353
- References
- 58
- FWCI
- 7.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What is the best size descriptor to use for pharmacokinetic studies in the obese? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2125.2004.02157.x
- The paper
- Green, B., & Duffull, S. B. (2004). What is the best size descriptor to use for pharmacokinetic studies in the obese? British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.2004.02157.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.