The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Polypharmacy and falls in the middle age and elderly population
Open accessAbstract
Aim: Falls in the elderly are common and often serious. We studied the association between multiple drug use (polypharmacy) and falls in the elderly. Methods: This was a population‐based cross‐sectional study, part of the Rotterdam Study. The participants were 6928 individuals aged ≥ 55 years. The prevalence of falls in the previous year was assessed. Medication use was determined with an interviewer‐administered questionnaire with verification of use. Polypharmacy was defined as the use of four or more drugs per day. Results: The prevalence of falls strongly increased with age. Falls were more common in women than in men. Fall risk increased with increasing disability, presence of joint complaints, use of a walking aid and fracture history. The risk of falling increased significantly with the number of drugs used per day (P for trend < 0.0001). After adjustment for a large number of comorbid conditions and disability, polypharmacy remained a significant risk factor for falling. Stratification for polypharmacy with or without at least one drug which is known to increase fall risk (notably CNS drugs and diuretics) disclosed that only polypharmacy with at least one risk drug was associated with an increased risk of falling. Conclusions: Fall risk is associated with the use of polypharmacy, but only when at least one established fall risk‐increasing drug was part of the daily regimen.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Guideline for the Prevention of Falls in Older Persons
Society, A. G., Society, G., Of, A. A., & On Falls Prevention, O. S. P. (2001) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49115.x · Cited by 2,242
Preventing Falls in Elderly Persons
Tinetti, M. E. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmcp020719 · Cited by 1,660
Cited by
Health Outcomes Associated with Polypharmacy in Community‐Dwelling Older Adults: A Systematic Review
Fried, T. R., O'Leary, J., Towle, V., Goldstein, M. K., Trentalange, M., & Martin, D. K. (2014) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/jgs.13153 · Cited by 721
Nobili, A., Garattini, S., & Mannucci, P. M. (2011) · Journal of Comorbidity · doi:10.15256/joc.2011.1.4 · Cited by 300
The clinical implications of ageing for rational drug therapy
Shi, S., Mörike, K., & Klotz, U. (2008) · European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00228-007-0422-1 · Cited by 244
Banerjee, A., Mbamalu, D., Ebrahimi, S., Khan, A. A., & Chan, T. F. (2011) · International Journal of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1186/1865-1380-4-22 · Cited by 75
The association between polypharmacy and malnutrition(risk) in older people: A systematic review
Kok, W. E., Haverkort, E. B., Algra, Y. A., Mollema, J., Hollaar, V. R. Y., Naumann, E., de van der Schueren, M. A. E., & Jerković-Ćosić, K. (2022) · Clinical Nutrition ESPEN · doi:10.1016/j.clnesp.2022.03.007 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- Ziere, G., Dieleman, J. P., Hofman, A., Pols, H. A. P., Van Der Cammen, T. J. M., & Stricker, B. H. C.
- Venue
- British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 218-223
- ISSN
- 0306-5251 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2125
- OpenAlex
- W2063508762
- Cited by
- 420
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Polypharmacy and falls in the middle age and elderly population. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2125.2005.02543.x
- The paper
- Ziere, G., Dieleman, J. P., Hofman, A., Pols, H. A. P., Van Der Cammen, T. J. M., & Stricker, B. H. C. (2006). Polypharmacy and falls in the middle age and elderly population. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.2005.02543.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.