Cited by 92Dermatology and Skin DiseasesContact Dermatitis and AllergiesAdvancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery

Efficacy and safety of topical WBI-1001 in patients with mild to severe atopic dermatitis: results from a 12-week, multicentre, randomized, placebo-controlled double-blind trial: WBI-1001 as a novel topical treatment for atopic dermatitis

Bissonnette, R., Poulin, Y., Zhou, Y., Tan, J., Hong, H.C., Webster, J., Ip, W., Tang, L. +1 more·2012·British Journal of Dermatology

Abstract

Background There is a need for the development of novel nonsteroidal topical drugs for the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD). Objectives The primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy of WBI-1001 over 6 weeks of treatment of mild to severe AD. Methods Patients with AD affecting 3-20% of their body surface area and with an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) of 2-4 were randomized (1 : 1 : 1) to receive placebo, WBI-1001 0·5% or WBI-1001 1·0% in a cream formulation applied twice daily for 6 weeks. At the end of this phase, patients receiving WBI-1001 continued the same treatment for an additional 6 weeks. Patients receiving placebo entered into a 6-week double-blind phase with re-randomization (1 : 1) to WBI-1001 0·5% or 1·0% cream. The primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy of WBI-1001 over 6 weeks of treatment of mild to severe AD. The primary endpoint was the mean change from baseline in IGA at day 42 (week 6). Results In total, 148 patients were randomized and analysed in the placebo (51), WBI-1001 0·5% (50) and WBI-1001 1·0% (47) groups. There was a decrease of 1·3 [43%; P Conclusions WBI-1001 is an efficacious novel topical anti-inflammatory molecule for the treatment of AD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2011.10775.x

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bissonnette, R., Poulin, Y., Zhou, Y., Tan, J., Hong, H. C., Webster, J., Ip, W., Tang, L., & Lyle, M.
Affiliations
  • Innovaderm (Canada) (CA)
  • Centre de Recherche Dermatologique du Québec Métropolitain (CA)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Windsor Clinical Research (CA)
  • Welichem Biotech (Canada) (CA)
Corresponding author
Bissonnette, R.
Venue
British Journal of Dermatology
Published
2012-03-14
Volume
166
Issue
4
Pages
853-860
ISSN
0007-0963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2117159275
Cited by
92
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery
Keywords
atopic dermatitis, topical treatment, Investigator's Global Assessment, treatment efficacy, drug safety, adverse drug reactions, folliculitis, contact dermatitis
MeSH terms
Administration, Cutaneous, Adult, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal, Chronic Disease, Dermatitis, Atopic, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Eczema, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Ointments, Resorcinols, Severity of Illness Index, Stilbenes, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review