Cited by 57Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer StudiesOptical Coherence Tomography ApplicationsCutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management

Actinic keratosis in the en-face and slice imaging mode of high-definition optical coherence tomography and comparison with histology: Actinic keratosis in high-definition optical coherence tomography

Maier, T., Braun-Falco, M., Laubender, R.P., Ruzicka, T., Berking, C.·2013·British Journal of Dermatology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) allows real-time, in vivo examination of nonmelanoma skin cancer. An innovative high-definition (HD)-OCT with a horizontal (en-face) and vertical (slice) imaging mode offers additional information in the diagnosis of actinic keratosis (AK) and may potentially replace invasive diagnostic biopsies. OBJECTIVES: To define the characteristic morphological features of AK by using HD-OCT in the two imaging modes compared with histopathology as gold standard. METHODS: In total, 20 AKs were examined by HD-OCT in the en-face and slice imaging modes and characteristic features were described and evaluated in comparison with the histopathological findings. Furthermore, the HD-OCT images of a subgroup of AKs were compared with those of the clinically normal adjacent skin. RESULTS: The preoperative in vivo diagnostics showed the following features in the en-face imaging mode of HD-OCT: disruption of stratum corneum, architectural disarray, cellular/nuclear polymorphism in the stratum granulosum/stratum spinosum, and bright irregular bundles in the superficial dermis. In the vertical slice imaging mode the following characteristics were found: irregular entrance signal, destruction of layering, white streaks and dots, and grey areas. In contrast, the clinically healthy adjacent skin showed mainly a regular epidermal 'honeycomb' pattern in the en-face mode and distinct layering of the skin in the slice mode. CONCLUSIONS: HD-OCT with both the en-face and slice imaging modes offers additional information in the diagnosis of AK compared with conventional OCT and might enhance the possibility of the noninvasive diagnosis of AK prior to treatment procedures and possibly in the monitoring of noninvasive treatment strategies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.11202.x

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maier, T., Braun-Falco, M., Laubender, R. P., Ruzicka, T., & Berking, C.
Affiliations
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Corresponding author
Maier, T.
Venue
British Journal of Dermatology
Published
2012-10-05
Volume
168
Issue
1
Pages
120-128
ISSN
0007-0963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2104944775
Cited by
57
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
7.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Optical Coherence Tomography Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
Keywords
actinic keratosis, high-definition optical coherence tomography, en face imaging, slice imaging, non-melanoma skin cancer, non-invasive diagnosis, histopathological correlation, stratum corneum disruption
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Biopsy, Face, Facial Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Tomography, Optical Coherence, Keratosis, Actinic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review