Cited by 174Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceChild Abuse and TraumaChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

The mental health of children who witness domestic violence

Meltzer, Howard, Doos, Lucy, Vostanis, Panos, Ford, Tamsin, Goodman, Robert·2009·Child & Family Social Work

Abstract

There is now considerable evidence that witnessing domestic violence can have adverse consequences for children. Our aim is to present the socio‐demographic correlates of children witnessing domestic violence and its association with childhood mental disorders. The biographic, socio‐demographic and socio‐economic characteristics of 7865 children and their families and measures of traumatic events including witnessing domestic violence were entered into a logistic regression analysis to establish the strength of association between witnessing severe domestic violence and childhood disorders. About 4% of children had witnessed severe domestic violence according to parent reports. Factors independently associated with a greater likelihood of a child witnessing domestic violence were: older age group, mixed ethnicity, physical disorder, several children in family, divorced parents, living in rented accommodation, poor neighbourhoods, the mother's emotional state and family dysfunction. Witnessing severe domestic violence almost tripled the likelihood of children having conduct disorder but was not independently associated with emotional disorders. There is a growing need for more research on the consequences of witnessing domestic violence to increase the awareness of social workers and policy‐makers to identify the needs of children who witness domestic violence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2206.2009.00633.x

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meltzer, H., Doos, L., Vostanis, P., Ford, T., & Goodman, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Leicester (GB)
  • University of Exeter (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Meltzer, Howard
Venue
Child & Family Social Work
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-10-05
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
491-501
ISSN
  • 1356-7500 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2206
OpenAlex
W2009963241
Cited by
174
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 11
FWCI
5.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child & Family Social Work (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
witnessing domestic violence, child mental health, child psychopathology, conduct disorder, emotional disorders, sociodemographic correlates, family dysfunction, parental divorce, neighborhood disadvantage, trauma exposure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review