An evaluation of the role of a store-and-forward teledermatology system in skin cancer diagnosis and management
Abstract
There is currently much interest in the potential role of telemedicine in improving the delivery of dermatological care in the UK. The two teledermatology systems available at present are divided into live video and store-and-forward technology. We investigated the value of a store-and-forward teledermatology system in the diagnosis and management of lesions suspicious of skin cancer. A total of 163 store-and-forward referrals of patients with one lesion each were assessed independently by a Consultant and a third-year trainee dermatologist. The accuracy of diagnosis and appropriateness of management from these assessments was compared to a subsequent face-to-face consultation with the Consultant. Analysis of the Consultants' diagnoses showed that 48% were identical for teledermatology and conventional face-to-face consultations. A further 17% of teledermatology diagnoses included the actual clinical diagnosis as a possibility but 20% were either incorrect or a diagnosis could not be made. In the remaining 15% of cases the digital image was of insufficient quality for assessment. Of the trainee's reports, 44% were identical to the clinical diagnoses and another 20% included the clinical diagnosis as a possibility. The management plan was appropriate in 55% of the total teledermatology referrals assessed by the Consultants and in 52% assessed by the trainee when compared with the conventional consultation. This study illustrates that the store-and forward type telemedicine system has limited diagnostic accuracy for skin lesions. However, our results suggest that store-and-forward teledermatology may be suitable and safe for screening out clearly benign lesions but the study casts doubt on its efficiency.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
One of the most active areas for teledermatology development and deployment has been in skin cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment management.
“One of the most active areas for teledermatology development and deployment has been in skin cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment management [44].”
From Recent directions in telemedicine: Review of trends in research and practice (2015) · cites this paper as [44]
Cites
Systematic review of studies of patient satisfaction with telemedicine
Mair, F. (2000) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7248.1517 · Cited by 734 · see citing works
Systematic review of cost effectiveness studies of telemedicine interventions
Whitten, P. S., Mair, F. S., Haycox, A., May, C. R., Williams, T. L., & Hellmich, S. (2002) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.324.7351.1434 · Cited by 526 · see citing works
The Substitution of Digital Images for Dermatologic Physical Examination
Kvedar, J. C. (1997) · Archives of Dermatology · doi:10.1001/archderm.1997.03890380031005 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Assessment of the accuracy of low-cost store-and-forward teledermatology consultation
High, W. A., Houston, M. S., Calobrisi, S. D., Drage, L. A., & McEvoy, M. T. (2000) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1067/mjd.2000.104519 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Reliability and accuracy of dermatologists’ clinic-based and digital image consultations
Whited, J. D., Hall, R. P., Simel, D. L., Foy, M. E., Stechuchak, K. M., Drugge, R. J., Grichnik, J. M., Myers, S. A., & Horner, R. D. (1999) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/s0190-9622(99)70003-4 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
A comparison of real‐time and store‐and‐forward teledermatology: a cost–benefit study
Loane, M. A., Bloomer, S. E., Corbett, R., Eedy, D. J., Hicks, N., Lotery, H. E., Mathews, C., Paisley, J., Steele, K., & Wootton, R. (2000) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2133.2000.03895.x · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Teledermatology in the nursing home
Zelickson, B. D. (1997) · Archives of Dermatology · doi:10.1001/archderm.133.2.171 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Patient and referring provider satisfaction with teledermatology
Weinstock, M. A., Nguyen, F. Q., & Risica, P. M. (2002) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1067/mjd.2002.119666 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Evaluating a telemedicine system to assist in the management of dermatology referrals
Taylor, P., Goldsmith, P., Murray, K., Harris, D., & Barkley, A. (2001) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2133.2001.04023.x · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Patient satisfaction with teledermatology is related to perceived quality of life
Finch, T. L., May, C. R., Esmail, A., Griffiths, C. E. M., Shaw, N., Fitzgerald, D., Stewart, E., Mould, M., Morgan, M., Pickup, L., et al. (2001) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2133.2001.04472.x · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Teledermatology—high technology or not?
Harrison, P. V., Kirby, B., Dickinson, Y., & Schofield, R. (1998) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1258/1357633981931344 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Lyon, C. C., & HARRISON, P. V. (1997) · Clinical and Experimental Dermatology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2230.1997.tb01052.x · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Evaluation of new technologies in health-care systems: what’s the context?
May, C. R., Mort, M., Mair, F. S., Ellis, N., & Gask, L. L. (2000) · Health Informatics Journal · doi:10.1177/146045820000600203 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Teledermatology for diagnosis and management of skin conditions: A systematic review
Warshaw, E. M., Hillman, Y. J., Greer, N. L., Hagel, E. M., MacDonald, R., Rutks, I. R., & Wilt, T. J. (2011) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2010.08.026 · Cited by 310 · see citing works
Teledermatology: a review and update
Lee, J. J., & English, J. C. (2018) · American Journal of Clinical Dermatology · doi:10.1007/s40257-017-0317-6 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
Telemedicine in dermatology: findings and experiences worldwide—a systematic literature review.
Trettel, A., Eissing, L., & Augustin, M. (2018) · Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology · doi:10.1111/jdv.14341 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
Recent directions in telemedicine: Review of trends in research and practice
Wilson, L. S., & Maeder, A. J. (2015) · Healthcare Informatics Research · doi:10.4258/hir.2015.21.4.213 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Teledermatology for diagnosing skin cancer in adults.
Chuchu, N., Dinnes, J., Takwoingi, Y., Matin, R. N., Bayliss, S. E., Davenport, C., Moreau, J. F., Bassett, O., Godfrey, K., O'Sullivan, C., et al. (2018) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd013193 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Accuracy of teledermatology for pigmented neoplasms
Warshaw, E. M., Lederle, F. A., Grill, J. P., Gravely, A. A., Bangerter, A. K., Fortier, L. A., Bohjanen, K. A., Chen, K., Lee, P. K., Rabinovitz, H. S., et al. (2009) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2009.04.032 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Store-and-Forward Teledermatology in Skin Cancer Triage
Moreno-Ramirez, D., Ferrandiz, L., Nieto-Garcia, A., Carrasco, R., Moreno-Alvarez, P., Galdeano, R., Bidegain, E., Rios-Martin, J. J., & Camacho, F. M. (2007) · Archives of Dermatology · doi:10.1001/archderm.143.4.479 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Smartphone Teledermoscopy Referrals: A Novel Process for Improved Triage of Skin Cancer Patients
Börve, A., Gyllencreutz, J., Terstappen, K., Backman, E., Aldenbratt, A., Danielsson, M., Gillstedt, M., Sandberg, C., & Paoli, J. (2015) · Acta Dermato Venereologica · doi:10.2340/00015555-1906 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Teledermatology: Key factors associated with reducing face-to-face dermatology visits
Landow, S. M., Mateus, A., Korgavkar, K., Nightingale, D., & Weinstock, M. A. (2014) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2014.02.021 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Application of mobile teledermatology for skin cancer screening
Lamel, S. A., Haldeman, K. M., Ely, H., Kovarik, C. L., Pak, H., & Armstrong, A. W. (2012) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2011.11.957 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Practice Guidelines for Teledermatology
McKoy, K., Antoniotti, N. M., Armstrong, A., Bashshur, R., Bernard, J., Bernstein, D., Burdick, A., Edison, K., Goldyne, M., Kovarik, C., et al. (2016) · Telemedicine and e-Health · doi:10.1089/tmj.2016.0137 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Teledermatology: A Review of Reliability and Accuracy of Diagnosis and Management
S. Levin, Y., & Warshaw, E. M. (2009) · Dermatologic Clinics · doi:10.1016/j.det.2008.11.012 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
The Empirical Foundations of Teledermatology: A Review of the Research Evidence
Bashshur, R. L., Shannon, G. W., Tejasvi, T., Kvedar, J. C., & Gates, M. (2015) · Telemedicine and e-Health · doi:10.1089/tmj.2015.0146 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Reliability of store and forward teledermatology for skin neoplasms
Warshaw, E. M., Gravely, A. A., & Nelson, D. B. (2015) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2014.11.001 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Bruce, A. F., Mallow, J. A., & Theeke, L. A. (2018) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1177/1357633x16686770 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
May, C., Giles, L., & Gupta, G. (2008) · Clinical and Experimental Dermatology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2230.2008.02850.x · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Kim, G. E., Afanasiev, O. K., O’Dell, C., Sharp, C., & Ko, J. M. (2020) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1177/1357633x18799805 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Telemedicina y teledermatología (II)
Romero, G., Cortina, P., & Vera, E. (2008) · Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas · doi:10.1016/s0001-7310(08)74755-0 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Koelink, C. J. L., Jonkman, M. F., Van Der Meer, K., & Van Der Heide, W. K. (2014) · European Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1684/ejd.2014.2275 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Diagnostic accuracy of teledermatology for skin diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Martyin, K., Meznerics, F. A., Bokor, L. A., Szabó, B., Hegyi, P., Kiss, N., & Bánvölgyi, A. (2026) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2026.1739592 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mahendran, R., Goodfield, M. J. D., & Sheehan-Dare, R. A.
- Affiliations
- Leeds General Infirmary (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Mahendran, R.
- Venue
- Clinical and Experimental Dermatology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-05
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 209-214
- ISSN
- 0307-6938 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2230
- OpenAlex
- W2050115096
- Cited by
- 80
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical and Experimental Dermatology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Government of the United Kingdom
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
- Keywords
- store-and-forward teledermatology, skin cancer diagnosis, suspicious skin lesions, diagnostic accuracy, telemedicine, digital image quality
- MeSH terms
- Clinical Competence, Dermatology, England, Family Practice, Humans, Referral and Consultation, Skin Neoplasms, Technology Assessment, Biomedical, Reproducibility of Results, Telemedicine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review