The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Identification of predominant environmental factors structuring stream macroinvertebrate communities within a large agricultural catchment
Abstract
SUMMARY: Patterns of macroinvertebrate community composition were examined in streams within a 40000‐km 2 catchment in central Michigan, U.S.A., to identify the major environmental gradients influencing community variation. Agriculture and associated clay and sandy soils predominated in much of the region. Eighty macroinvertebrate taxa were collected from stream surveys conducted during May and August 1990. Community composition varied primarily by the proportions of Plecoptera and Ephemeroptera. Benthic communities from the heaviest agricultural zones were most different from those at other sites. Chemical composition among the sites varied most in relation to nutrients (NH 3, NO3, PO 4). Other parameters were relatively similar. Physical characteristics of the sites were scored in six habitat categories: (i) substrate characteristics, (ii) instream cover, (iii) channel morphology, (iv) riparian zone and stream‐bank conditions, (v) riffle/run quality, (vi) pool quality. Most physical habitat scores were lowest in the intense agriculture zones. The relative importance of physical and chemical variables in explaining variation in macroinvertebrate communities was quantified using canonical correspondence analysis. Substrate characteristics were most important in both surveys. Significant correlations (P<0.05 and P<0.10) were observed between substrate quality and total numbers of Ephemeropteran, Plecopteran, and Trichopteran taxa. These relationships reflected correlations from sites in the clay soil‐type region (P<0.01 and P<0.10) which contrasted with non‐significant results from the less impacted, sandy soil‐type region. Effective stream restoration efforts in this region will require the alteration of local land‐use activities that influence the physical habitat. Further development of empirical relationships between catchment activities and substrate and channel characteristics within natural geomorphic regions is essential for the evaluation of restoration projects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Reynoldson, T. B., Norris, R. H., Resh, V. H., Day, K. E., & Rosenberg, D. M. (1997) · Journal of the North American Benthological Society · doi:10.2307/1468175 · Cited by 641
Effects of land use on water quality and aquatic biota of three North Carolina Piedmont streams
Lenat, D. R., & Crawford, J. K. (1994) · Hydrobiologia · doi:10.1007/bf00021291 · Cited by 586
Agricultural drainage ditches, their biological importance and functioning
Herzon, I., & Helenius, J. (2008) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.03.005 · Cited by 391
Townsend, C. R., Dolédec, S., Norris, R., Peacock, K., & Arbuckle, C. (2003) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2427.2003.01043.x · Cited by 309
Metadata
- Authors
- RICHARDS, C., HOST, G. E., & ARTHUR, J. W.
- Venue
- Freshwater Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1993-04
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 285-294
- ISSN
- 0046-5070 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2427
- OpenAlex
- W1983494330
- Cited by
- 240
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identification of predominant environmental factors structuring stream macroinvertebrate communities within a large agricultural catchment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1993.tb00764.x
- The paper
- RICHARDS, C., HOST, G. E., & ARTHUR, J. W. (1993). Identification of predominant environmental factors structuring stream macroinvertebrate communities within a large agricultural catchment. Freshwater Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1993.tb00764.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.