The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Soil carbon sequestrations by nitrogen fertilizer application, straw return and no‐tillage in China's cropland
Open accessAbstract
Soil as the largest global carbon pool has played a great role in sequestering the atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO 2). Although global carbon sequestration potentials have been assessed since the 1980s, few investigations have been made on soil carbon sequestration (SCS) in China's cropland. China is a developing country and has a long history of agricultural activities. Estimation of SCS potentials in China's cropland is very important for assessing the potential measures to prevent the atmospheric carbon rise and predicting the atmospheric CO 2 concentration in future. After review of the available results of the field experiments in China, relationships between SCS and nitrogen fertilizer application, straw return and no‐tillage (NT) practices were established for each of the four agricultural regions. According to the current agricultural practices and their future development, estimations were made on SCS by nitrogen fertilizer application, straw return and NT in China's cropland. In the current situation, nitrogen fertilizer application, straw return and zero tillage can sequester 5.96, 9.76 and 0.800 Tg C each year. Carbon sequestration potential will increase to 12.1 Tg C yr−1 if nitrogen is fertilized on experts' recommendations. The carbon sequestration potentials of straw return and NT can reach 34.4 and 4.60 Tg C yr−1 when these two techniques are further popularized. In these measures, straw return is the most promising one. Full popularization of straw return can reduce 5.3% of the CO 2 emission from fossil fuel combustion in China in 1990, which meets the global mean CO 2 reduction requested by the Kyoto Protocol (5.2%). In general, if more incentive policies can be elaborated and implemented, the SCS in China's cropland will be increased by about two times. So, popularization of the above‐mentioned agricultural measures for carbon sequestration can be considered as an effective tool to prevent the rapid rise of the atmospheric CO 2 in China.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stabilization mechanisms of soil organic matter: Implications for C-saturation of soils
Six, J., Conant, R. T., Paul, E. A., & Paustian, K. (2002) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1023/a:1016125726789 · Cited by 4,633
Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration Rates by Tillage and Crop Rotation: A Global Data Analysis
West, T. O., & Post, W. M. (2002) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj2002.1930 · Cited by 2,215 · cited 1×
“Using a global database of 67 long-term agricultural experiments, comprising 276 paired treatments, West & Post (2002) pointed out that, on average, a change from conventional tillage (CT) to NT could sequester 14–57 g C m 2 yr 1.”
MethodCarbon losses from all soils across England and Wales 1978–2003
Bellamy, P. H., Loveland, P. J., Bradley, R. I., Lark, R. M., & Kirk, G. J. D. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04038 · Cited by 1,131
Carbon sequestration in croplands: the potential in Europe and the global context
Smith, P. (2004) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/j.eja.2003.08.002 · Cited by 569
West, T. O., & Six, J. (2007) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-006-9173-8 · Cited by 360
Cited by
Minasny, B., Malone, B. P., McBratney, A. B., Angers, D. A., Arrouays, D., Chambers, A., Chaplot, V., Chen, Z.-S., Cheng, K., Das, B. S., et al. (2017) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.01.002 · Cited by 2,239
Agricultural Non-Point Source Pollution in China: Causes and Mitigation Measures
Sun, B., Zhang, L., Yang, L., Zhang, F., Norse, D., & Zhu, Z. (2012) · AMBIO · doi:10.1007/s13280-012-0249-6 · Cited by 587
Current status and environment impact of direct straw return in China’s cropland – A review
Li, H., Dai, M., Dai, S., & Dong, X. (2018) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.05.014 · Cited by 459
Soil organic carbon sequestration potential of cropland in China
Qin, Z., Huang, Y., & Zhuang, Q. (2013) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1002/gbc.20068 · Cited by 125
Kämpf, I., Hölzel, N., Störrle, M., Broll, G., & Kiehl, K. (2016) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.067 · Cited by 88
Metadata
- Authors
- LU, F., WANG, X., HAN, B., OUYANG, Z., DUAN, X., ZHENG, H., & MIAO, H.
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-01-16
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 281-305
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W2162933095
- Cited by
- 434
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 17.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Soil carbon sequestrations by nitrogen fertilizer application, straw return and no‐tillage in China's cropland. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01743.x
- The paper
- LU, F., WANG, X., HAN, B., OUYANG, Z., DUAN, X., ZHENG, H., & MIAO, H. (2009). Soil carbon sequestrations by nitrogen fertilizer application, straw return and no‐tillage in China's cropland. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01743.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.