Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 555

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Climate change and plant distribution: local models predict high‐elevation persistence

Open access
RANDIN, CHRISTOPHE F., ENGLER, ROBIN, NORMAND, SIGNE, ZAPPA, MASSIMILIANO, ZIMMERMANN, NIKLAUS E., PEARMAN, PETER B., VITTOZ, PASCAL, THUILLER, WILFRIED, GUISAN, ANTOINE·2009·Global Change Biology

Abstract

Mountain ecosystems will likely be affected by global warming during the 21st century, with substantial biodiversity loss predicted by species distribution models (SDMs). Depending on the geographic extent, elevation range, and spatial resolution of data used in making these models, different rates of habitat loss have been predicted, with associated risk of species extinction. Few coordinated across‐scale comparisons have been made using data of different resolutions and geographic extents. Here, we assess whether climate change‐induced habitat losses predicted at the European scale (10 × 10′ grid cells) are also predicted from local‐scale data and modeling (25 m × 25 m grid cells) in two regions of the Swiss Alps. We show that local‐scale models predict persistence of suitable habitats in up to 100% of species that were predicted by a European‐scale model to lose all their suitable habitats in the area. Proportion of habitat loss depends on climate change scenario and study area. We find good agreement between the mismatch in predictions between scales and the fine‐grain elevation range within 10 × 10′ cells. The greatest prediction discrepancy for alpine species occurs in the area with the largest nival zone. Our results suggest elevation range as the main driver for the observed prediction discrepancies. Local‐scale projections may better reflect the possibility for species to track their climatic requirement toward higher elevations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01766.x

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 64 references

Cited by

See all 555

Metadata

Authors
RANDIN, C. F., ENGLER, R., NORMAND, S., ZAPPA, M., ZIMMERMANN, N. E., PEARMAN, P. B., VITTOZ, P., THUILLER, W., & GUISAN, A.
Venue
Global Change Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-05-04
Volume
15
Issue
6
Pages
1557-1569
ISSN
  • 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2486
OpenAlex
W2164772977
Cited by
555
References
64
FWCI
21.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Climate change and plant distribution: local models predict high‐elevation persistence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01766.x
The paper
RANDIN, C. F., ENGLER, R., NORMAND, S., ZAPPA, M., ZIMMERMANN, N. E., PEARMAN, P. B., VITTOZ, P., THUILLER, W., & GUISAN, A. (2009). Climate change and plant distribution: local models predict high‐elevation persistence. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01766.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.