The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fungal community responses to precipitation: FUNGAL CLIMATE RESPONSE
Abstract
Understanding how fungal communities are affected by precipitation is an essential aspect of predicting soil functional responses to future climate change and the consequences of those responses for the soil carbon cycle. We tracked fungal abundance, fungal community composition, and soil carbon across 4 years in long-term field manipulations of rainfall in northern California. Fungi responded directly to rainfall levels, with more abundant, diverse, and consistent communities predominating under drought conditions, and less abundant, less diverse, and more variable communities emerging during wetter periods and in rain-addition treatments. Soil carbon storage itself did not vary with rainfall amendments, but increased decomposition rates foreshadow longer-term losses of soil carbon under conditions of extended seasonal rainfall. The repeated recovery of fungal diversity and abundance during periodic drought events suggests that species with a wide range of environmental tolerances coexist in this community, consistent with a storage effect in soil fungi. Increased diversity during dry periods further suggests that drought stress moderates competition among fungal taxa. Based on the responses observed here, we suggest that there may be a relationship between the timescale at which soil microbial communities experience natural environmental fluctuations and their ability to respond to future environmental change.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs
Altschul, S. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · Cited by 73,302
Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics
White, T. J., Bruns, T., Lee, S., & Taylor, J. (1990) · PCR Protocols · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1 · Cited by 36,648
GARDES, M., & BRUNS, T. D. (1993) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.1993.tb00005.x · Cited by 10,480
Pruesse, E., Quast, C., Knittel, K., Fuchs, B. M., Ludwig, W., Peplies, J., & Glockner, F. O. (2007) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkm864 · Cited by 6,668
Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity
Chesson, P. (2000) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.343 · Cited by 6,645
Analysis of Ecological Communities
Anderson, M. J. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology · doi:10.1016/s0022-0981(03)00091-1 · Cited by 5,086
McGONIGLE, T. P., MILLER, M. H., EVANS, D. G., FAIRCHILD, G. L., & SWAN, J. A. (1990) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1990.tb00476.x · Cited by 3,878
Resistance, resilience, and redundancy in microbial communities
Allison, S. D., & Martiny, J. B. H. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0801925105 · Cited by 3,151
Water relations, drought and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis
Augé, R. M. (2001) · Mycorrhiza · doi:10.1007/s005720100097 · Cited by 2,210
Ecological Niches: Linking Classical and Contemporary Approaches
Chase, J. M., & Leibold, M. A. (2003) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226101811.001.0001 · Cited by 1,883
Cited by
Mapping the niche space of soil microorganisms using taxonomy and traits
Lennon, J. T., Aanderud, Z. T., Lehmkuhl, B. K., & Schoolmaster, D. R. (2012) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/11-1745.1 · Cited by 435
The effect of fire on microbial biomass: a meta-analysis of field studies
Dooley, S. R., & Treseder, K. K. (2012) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1007/s10533-011-9633-8 · Cited by 385
Gao, C., Montoya, L., Xu, L., Madera, M., Hollingsworth, J., Purdom, E., Singan, V., Vogel, J., Hutmacher, R. B., Dahlberg, J. A., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-13913-9 · Cited by 341
Legacy effects of drought on plant–soil feedbacks and plant–plant interactions
Kaisermann, A., de Vries, F. T., Griffiths, R. I., & Bardgett, R. D. (2017) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.14661 · Cited by 328
Archaeorhizomycetes: Unearthing an Ancient Class of Ubiquitous Soil Fungi
Rosling, A., Cox, F., Cruz-Martinez, K., Ihrmark, K., Grelet, G.-A., Lindahl, B. D., Menkis, A., & James, T. Y. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1206958 · Cited by 295
Metadata
- Authors
- HAWKES, C. V., KIVLIN, S. N., ROCCA, J. D., HUGUET, V., THOMSEN, M. A., & SUTTLE, K. B.
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-10-21
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1637-1645
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2118606447
- Cited by
- 386
- References
- 63
- FWCI
- 17.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fungal community responses to precipitation: FUNGAL CLIMATE RESPONSE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02327.x
- The paper
- HAWKES, C. V., KIVLIN, S. N., ROCCA, J. D., HUGUET, V., THOMSEN, M. A., & SUTTLE, K. B. (2011). Fungal community responses to precipitation: FUNGAL CLIMATE RESPONSE. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02327.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
