Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 491

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of biotic disturbances on forest carbon cycling in theUnitedStates andCanada

Hicke, Jeffrey A., Allen, Craig D., Desai, Ankur R., Dietze, Michael C., Hall, Ronald J., (Ted) Hogg, Edward H., Kashian, Daniel M., Moore, David, Raffa, Kenneth F., Sturrock, Rona N., Vogelmann, James·2012·Global Change Biology

Abstract

Forest insects and pathogens are major disturbance agents that have affected millions of hectares in N orth A merica in recent decades, implying significant impacts to the carbon (C) cycle. Here, we review and synthesize published studies of the effects of biotic disturbances on forest C cycling in the U nited S tates and C anada. Primary productivity in stands was reduced, sometimes considerably, immediately following insect or pathogen attack. After repeated growth reductions caused by some insects or pathogens or a single infestation by some bark beetle species, tree mortality occurred, altering productivity and decomposition. In the years following disturbance, primary productivity in some cases increased rapidly as a result of enhanced growth by surviving vegetation, and in other cases increased slowly because of lower forest regrowth. In the decades following tree mortality, decomposition increased as a result of the large amount of dead organic matter. Net ecosystem productivity decreased immediately following attack, with some studies reporting a switch to a C source to the atmosphere, and increased afterward as the forest regrew and dead organic matter decomposed. Large variability in C cycle responses arose from several factors, including type of insect or pathogen, time since disturbance, number of trees affected, and capacity of remaining vegetation to increase growth rates following outbreak. We identified significant knowledge gaps, including limited understanding of carbon cycle impacts among different biotic disturbance types (particularly pathogens), their impacts at landscape and regional scales, and limited capacity to predict disturbance events and their consequences for carbon cycling. We conclude that biotic disturbances can have major impacts on forest C stocks and fluxes and can be large enough to affect regional C cycling. However, additional research is needed to reduce the uncertainties associated with quantifying biotic disturbance effects on the N orth A merican C budget.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02543.x

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 491

Metadata

Authors
Hicke, J. A., Allen, C. D., Desai, A. R., Dietze, M. C., Hall, R. J., (Ted) Hogg, E. H., Kashian, D. M., Moore, D., Raffa, K. F., Sturrock, R. N., & Vogelmann, J.
Venue
Global Change Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-10-27
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
7-34
ISSN
  • 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2486
OpenAlex
W2119292227
Cited by
491
References
6
FWCI
27.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of biotic disturbances on forest carbon cycling in theUnitedStates andCanada. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02543.x
The paper
Hicke, J. A., Allen, C. D., Desai, A. R., Dietze, M. C., Hall, R. J., (Ted) Hogg, E. H., Kashian, D. M., Moore, D., Raffa, K. F., Sturrock, R. N., & Vogelmann, J. (2012). Effects of biotic disturbances on forest carbon cycling in theUnitedStates andCanada. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02543.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.