The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Soil organic carbon stocks in southeast Germany (Bavaria) as affected by land use, soil type and sampling depth
Open accessAbstract
Precise estimations of soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks are of decided importance for the detection of C sequestration or emission potential induced by land use changes. For Germany, a comprehensive, land use–specific SOC data set has not yet been compiled. We evaluated a unique data set of 1460 soil profiles in southeast Germany in order to calculate representative SOC stocks to a depth of 1 m for the main land use types. The results showed that grassland soils stored the highest amount of SOC, with a median value of 11.8 kg m−2, whereas considerably lower stocks of 9.8 and 9.0 kg m−2 were found for forest and cropland soils, respectively. However, the differences between extensively used land (grassland, forest) and cropland were much lower compared with results from other studies in central European countries. The depth distribution of SOC showed that despite low SOC concentrations in A horizons of cropland soils, their stocks were not considerably lower compared with other land uses. This was due to a deepening of the topsoil compared with grassland soils. Higher grassland SOC stocks were caused by an accumulation of SOC in the B horizon which was attributable to a high proportion of C‐rich Gleysols within grassland soils. This demonstrates the relevance of pedogenetic SOC inventories instead of solely land use–based approaches. Our study indicated that cultivation‐induced SOC depletion was probably often overestimated since most studies use fixed depth increments. Moreover, the application of modelled parameters in SOC inventories is questioned because a calculation of SOC stocks using different pedotransfer functions revealed considerably biased results. We recommend SOC stocks be determined by horizon for the entire soil profile in order to estimate the impact of land use changes precisely and to evaluate C sequestration potentials more accurately.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2025) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 352,181
Gee, G. W., & Bauder, J. W. (1986) · SSSA Book Series · doi:10.2136/sssabookser5.1.2ed.c15 · Cited by 8,807
World Reference Base for Soil Resources
Driessen, P., Nachtergaele, F., Spaargaren, O., & Seppe Deckers, J. (2005) · Encyclopedia of Soil Science, Second Edition · doi:10.1201/noe0849338304.ch410 · Cited by 7,248
THE VERTICAL DISTRIBUTION OF SOIL ORGANIC CARBON AND ITS RELATION TO CLIMATE AND VEGETATION
Jobbágy, E. G., & Jackson, R. B. (2000) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0423:tvdoso]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 5,428
Soil carbon stocks and land use change: a meta analysis
Guo, L. B., & Gifford, R. M. (2002) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1354-1013.2002.00486.x · Cited by 3,972
Total carbon and nitrogen in the soils of the world
BATJES, N. H. (1996) · European Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.1996.tb01386.x · Cited by 3,213
Methods of Soil Analysis 2d ed., pt. 1; Physical and Mineralogical Methods
Klute, A. (1988) · Soil Science · doi:10.1097/00010694-198808000-00014 · Cited by 3,145
A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes
Jackson, R. B., Canadell, J., Ehleringer, J. R., Mooney, H. A., Sala, O. E., & Schulze, E. D. (1996) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00333714 · Cited by 3,071
Soil carbon sequestration and land‐use change: processes and potential
Post, W. M., & Kwon, K. C. (2000) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.00308.x · Cited by 2,602
Total carbon and nitrogen in the soils of the world
Batjes, N. H. (2014) · European Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.1111/ejss.12114_2 · Cited by 2,550
Cited by
Modeling Soil Processes: Review, Key Challenges, and New Perspectives
Vereecken, H., Schnepf, A., Hopmans, J. W., Javaux, M., Or, D., Roose, T., Vanderborght, J., Young, M. H., Amelung, W., Aitkenhead, M., et al. (2016) · Vadose Zone Journal · doi:10.2136/vzj2015.09.0131 · Cited by 833
Digital Mapping of Soil Organic Carbon Contents and Stocks in Denmark
Adhikari, K., Hartemink, A. E., Minasny, B., Bou Kheir, R., Greve, M. B., & Greve, M. H. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0105519 · Cited by 364
Poeplau, C., Vos, C., & Don, A. (2017) · SOIL · doi:10.5194/soil-3-61-2017 · Cited by 330
Soil carbon sequestration and land use change associated with biofuel production: empirical evidence
Qin, Z., Dunn, J. B., Kwon, H., Mueller, S., & Wander, M. M. (2016) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12237 · Cited by 208
Modelling Carbon Stocks and Fluxes in the Wood Product Sector: A Comparative Review
Brunet‐Navarro, P., Jochheim, H., & Muys, B. (2016) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.13235 · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- Wiesmeier, M., Spörlein, P., Geuß, U., Hangen, E., Haug, S., Reischl, A., Schilling, B., von Lützow, M., & Kögel‐Knabner, I.
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-04-24
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2233-2245
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W2113953899
- Cited by
- 344
- References
- 55
- FWCI
- 27.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Soil organic carbon stocks in southeast Germany (Bavaria) as affected by land use, soil type and sampling depth. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02699.x
- The paper
- Wiesmeier, M., Spörlein, P., Geuß, U., Hangen, E., Haug, S., Reischl, A., Schilling, B., von Lützow, M., & Kögel‐Knabner, I. (2012). Soil organic carbon stocks in southeast Germany (Bavaria) as affected by land use, soil type and sampling depth. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02699.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.