Cited by 260Sperm and Testicular FunctionReproductive Health and TechnologiesMale Reproductive Health Studies

Male factors and the likelihood of pregnancy in infertile couples. I. Study of sperm characteristics

JOUANNET, P., DUCOT, B., FENEUX, D., SPIRA, A.·1988·International Journal of Andrology

Abstract

A prospective study of 394 infertile men was conducted over 3 years following a primary semen analysis. The cumulative pregnancy rate was 43 and 64% after 1 and 3 years, respectively. The pregnancy rate was significantly higher in the secondary infertile group. The study of various sperm factors and the occurrence of pregnancy showed that they were not of equal significance in predicting male fertility potential. The percentage of pregnancies decreased significantly only when the sperm concentration was less than 5 x 10(6)/ml. The pregnancy rate increased significantly with the percentage of motile sperm. The percentage of sperm with normal morphology was also found to be significantly higher when a pregnancy occurred than when the couple remained infertile (43.6% vs 37.7%). In a detailed morphological analysis of the sperm, six abnormalities (microcephaly, double head, amorphous head, cytoplasmic droplet, bent tail and coiled tail) were found to be significantly more frequent when a pregnancy did not occur. The most predictive value was given by the Multiple Anomalies Index (MAI), which is the mean number of abnormalities observed per abnormal sperm. The pregnancy rate was significantly lower after both 1 and 3 years when the MAI was greater than 1.6. Multivariate analysis showed that the best prognostic indicator of fertility was given by the percentage of motile sperm and the MAI, particularly in patients with primary infertility.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2605.1988.tb01011.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
JOUANNET, P., DUCOT, B., FENEUX, D., & SPIRA, A.
Affiliations
Université Paris-Sud (FR)
Corresponding author
JOUANNET, P.
Venue
International Journal of Andrology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1988-10
Volume
11
Issue
5
Pages
379-394
ISSN
  • 0105-6263 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2605
OpenAlex
W2109952587
Cited by
260
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 10
FWCI
4.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Andrology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Male Reproductive Health Studies
Keywords
male infertility, sperm characteristics, pregnancy rate, secondary infertility, sperm motility, sperm morphology, sperm concentration, primary infertility, infertile couples, fertility prediction
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Infertility, Male, Male, Pregnancy, Prospective Studies, Sperm Count, Sperm Motility, Spermatozoa, Models, Statistical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review