Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 358

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 186 of the 186 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

n‐3 Omega fatty acids: a review of current knowledge

Gogus, Ugur, Smith, Chris·2010·International Journal of Food Science & Technology

Abstract

Summary: The very long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) (C18–C22) and n‐3 Omega PUFAs are apparently widely accepted as a part of modern nutrition because of their beneficial effects on metabolism. Most significantly, the reported protective effect of the n‐3 omega fatty acids in relation to cardiovascular inflammatory diseases and cancer has led people to consider these fatty acids more beneficial than other dietary supplements. Unfortunately, there is a lack of studies relating to the physical performance increasing effect in sports diets, cholesterol‐reducing effect in meat technology, effects on human serum profile, the application dose and the side effects with/without omega‐6 PUFAs, which has left us with several crucial unanswered questions. We still do not know the correct dose of n‐3 omega and the correct ratio of n‐3 omega to n‐6 omega or their possible contraindications when combined with drugs, other foods and herbal supplements. Another reported aspect of n‐3 omega PUFAs is that they protect and even enhance the effect in medical treatment of important diseases such as Alzheimer’s, multiple sclerosis and cancer. These reports led to PUFAs becoming one of the most accepted and consumed food supplements. Despite this weight of evidence and the considerable current use, there is still a need for studies, which will determine whether the n‐3 omega fatty acids are in fact important functional supplements with no adverse effects. This review will attempt to outline the current position of n‐3 omega fatty acids in the field of clinical nutrition and healthcare and outline the studies needed to determine whether there are significant advantages in taking them as food supplement without any adverse effects.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2009.02151.x

Cites

186 of 186 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 186 references

Cited by

See all 358

Metadata

Authors
Gogus, U., & Smith, C.
Venue
International Journal of Food Science & Technology
Published
2010-02-10
Volume
45
Issue
3
Pages
417-436
ISSN
  • 0950-5423 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2621
OpenAlex
W1984992490
Cited by
358
References
186
FWCI
17.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: n‐3 Omega fatty acids: a review of current knowledge. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2009.02151.x
The paper
Gogus, U., & Smith, C. (2010). n‐3 Omega fatty acids: a review of current knowledge. International Journal of Food Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2009.02151.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.