The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Variables related to research utilization in nursing: an empirical investigation
Abstract
The purpose of the correlational study was to identify variables which were related to utilization of research in the clinical area. A convenience sample of 59 nurses from a community hospital in the southwest part of the United States was utilized for the sample. The concepts of attitude, support and availability were identified through the literature and used as independent variables for this study. Scales were developed from past research and tested for validity and reliability. Results indicated that attitude and availability were related to research utilization (R= 0.65, P 0.00). In addition, the support of administrators was also important in determining research use. Results from this study can be used to develop strategies to increase research utilization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Individual determinants of research utilization by nurses: a systematic review update
Squires, J. E., Estabrooks, C. A., Gustavsson, P., & Wallin, L. (2011) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-6-1 · Cited by 798
Cummings, G. G., Tate, K., Lee, S., Wong, C. A., Paananen, T., Micaroni, S. P. M., & Chatterjee, G. E. (2018) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.04.016 · Cited by 637
Individual determinants of research utilization: a systematic review
Estabrooks, C. A., Floyd, J. A., Scott‐Findlay, S., O'Leary, K. A., & Gushta, M. (2003) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02748.x · Cited by 490
Lewis, C. C., Fischer, S., Weiner, B. J., Stanick, C., Kim, M., & Martinez, R. G. (2015) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-015-0342-x · Cited by 430
Melnyk, B. M., Fineout‐Overholt, E., Fischbeck Feinstein, N., Li, H., Small, L., Wilcox, L., & Kraus, R. (2004) · Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1524-475x.2004.04024.x · Cited by 372
Metadata
- Authors
- Champion, V. L., & Leach, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Advanced Nursing
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1989-09
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 705-710
- ISSN
- 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2648
- OpenAlex
- W1985188971
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Variables related to research utilization in nursing: an empirical investigation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1989.tb01634.x
- The paper
- Champion, V. L., & Leach, A. (1989). Variables related to research utilization in nursing: an empirical investigation. Journal of Advanced Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1989.tb01634.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
