Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 299

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Role development and effective practice in specialist and advanced practice roles in acute hospital settings: systematic review and meta‐synthesis

Jones, Myfanwy Lloyd·2005·Journal of Advanced Nursing

Abstract

Aims. This paper reports a study whose aim was to identify and synthesize qualitative research studies reporting barriers or facilitators to role development and/or effective practice in specialist and advanced nursing roles in acute hospital settings. Background. The number of clinical nurse specialist, nurse practitioner, advanced nurse practitioner and consultant nurse roles has grown substantially in recent years. Research has shown that nurses working in innovative roles encounter a range of barriers and facilitators to effective practice. Methods. Systematic literature searches were undertaken, and relevant studies identified using specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. The selected studies were appraised, and their findings synthesized using Ritchie and Spencer's ‘Framework’ approach. Results. Fourteen relevant studies were identified, mostly from the UK. They described a range of barriers and facilitators affecting specialist and advanced nursing practice. These related to the practitioner's personal characteristics and previous experience, professional and educational issues, managerial and organizational issues, relationships with other health care professionals, and resources. The factors most widely identified as important were relationships with other key personnel, and role definitions and expectations. Conclusions. Relationships with other staff groups and role ambiguity are the most important factors which hinder or facilitate the implementation of specialist and advanced nursing roles. These factors seem interlinked, and the associated problems do not appear to resolve spontaneously when staff become familiar with the new roles. In order to reduce role ambiguity and the consequent likelihood of negative responses we recommend that, when specialist and advanced nursing roles are introduced, clear role definitions and objectives are developed and communicated to relevant staff groups; these definitions and objectives should be updated as necessary.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03279.x

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Cited by

See all 299

Metadata

Authors
Jones, M. L.
Venue
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-01
Volume
49
Issue
2
Pages
191-209
ISSN
  • 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2648
OpenAlex
W2147931168
Cited by
299
References
30
FWCI
3.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Role development and effective practice in specialist and advanced practice roles in acute hospital settings: systematic review and meta‐synthesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03279.x
The paper
Jones, M. L. (2005). Role development and effective practice in specialist and advanced practice roles in acute hospital settings: systematic review and meta‐synthesis. Journal of Advanced Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03279.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.