The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Qualitative Data Analysis
Abstract
Qualitative data analysis shares some similarities with quantitative data analysis. Both methods systematically summarize and compare data to obtain theoretical ideas from empirical data. There are key differences in the purpose and procedure of qualitative data analysis that distinguishes it from quantitative data analysis. The foundation of analyzing non-numeric data is finding meanings implied in the data. In-depth interviewing is perhaps the most widely used qualitative method. Transcribed interviews are treated as text data, similar to archival data or other document-type data. In quantitative analysis, the primary goal is to reduce data into numbers that can be manipulated and computed mathematically. Qualitative data coding can be done in a top-down fashion as well. Grounded theory methods develop a theory grounded in the data by way of a multi-level coding and summary procedure. An analytic summary requires comparing, generalizing, sequencing/ordering, and making inferences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers
Lungu, M. (2022) · American Journal of Qualitative Research · doi:10.29333/ajqr/12085 · Cited by 10,826
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
Brodsky, C. M. (1968) · Psychosomatics · doi:10.1016/s0033-3182(68)71872-7 · Cited by 6,679
Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2012) · Cited by 5,975
Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice
Schreier, M. (2012) · doi:10.4135/9781529682571 · Cited by 5,801
FOUNDATION FOR A GENERAL STRAIN THEORY OF CRIME AND DELINQUENCY*
AGNEW, R. (1992) · Criminology · doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1992.tb01093.x · Cited by 5,046
Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches
Bernard, H. R. (2012) · Cited by 3,524
Servants of Globalization: Women, Migration, and Domestic Work
Avila, E. M., & Parrenas, R. S. (2002) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/3089067 · Cited by 2,535
(2001) · Cited by 1,866
Qualitative Data Analysis: Practical Strategies
Bazeley, P. (2020) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,372
Investigating the Social World: The Process and Practice of Research
Kleiman, M. B., Schutt, R. K., Baily, C. A., Czaja, R., Blair, J., Maisel, R., & Persell, C. H. (1997) · Teaching Sociology · doi:10.2307/1319118 · Cited by 697
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Berg Bruce, 2011, Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences
Cited by
Antecedents of supply chain visibility in retail supply chains: A resource‐based theory perspective
Barratt, M., & Oke, A. (2007) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2007.01.003 · Cited by 702
The impact of digital technology on relationships in a business network
Pagani, M., & Pardo, C. (2017) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.08.009 · Cited by 618
PRO development: rigorous qualitative research as the crucial foundation
Lasch, K. E., Marquis, P., Vigneux, M., Abetz, L., Arnould, B., Bayliss, M., Crawford, B., & Rosa, K. (2010) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-010-9677-6 · Cited by 461
Jones, M. L. (2005) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03279.x · Cited by 299
Food Insecurity and Sexual Risk in an HIV Endemic Community in Uganda
Miller, C. L., Bangsberg, D. R., Tuller, D. M., Senkungu, J., Kawuma, A., Frongillo, E. A., & Weiser, S. D. (2011) · AIDS and Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10461-010-9693-0 · Cited by 177
Metadata
- Venue
- Student Research and Report Writing
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-01-26
- Pages
- 1-15
- OpenAlex
- W4392010819
- Cited by
- 624
- References
- 12
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Qualitative Data Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/9781119104490.ch10
- The paper
- Qualitative Data Analysis. (2016). Student Research and Report Writing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119104490.ch10
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
