Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 849

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Translation of scales in cross‐cultural research: issues and techniques

Open access
Cha, Eun‐Seok, Kim, Kevin H., Erlen, Judith A.·2007·Journal of Advanced Nursing

Abstract

Aims. This paper is a report of a study designed to: (i) describe issues and techniques of translation of standard measures for use in international research; (ii) identify a user‐friendly and valid translation method when researchers have limited resources during translation procedure; and (iii) discuss translation issues using data from a pilot study as an example. Background. The process of translation is an important part of cross‐cultural studies. Cross‐cultural researchers are often confronted by the need to translate scales from one language to another and to do this with limited resources. Method. The lessons learned from our experience in a pilot study are presented to underline the importance of using appropriate translation procedures. The issues of the back‐translation method are discussed to identify strategies to ensure success when translating measures. Findings. A combined technique is an appropriate method to maintain the content equivalences between the original and translated instruments in international research. There are several possible combinations of translation techniques. However, there is no gold standard of translation techniques because the research environment (e.g. accessibility and availability of bilingual people) and the research questions are different. Conclusions. It is important to use appropriate translation procedures and to employ a combined translation technique based on the research environment and questions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04242.x

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Brislin R.W., 1973, Cross‐Cultural Research Method
  2. John M.T., 2006, Translating the research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders into German: evaluation of content and process, Journal of Orofacial Pain, 20, 43

Cited by

See all 849

Metadata

Authors
Cha, E., Kim, K. H., & Erlen, J. A.
Venue
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-04-17
Volume
58
Issue
4
Pages
386-395
ISSN
  • 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2648
OpenAlex
W2025111410
Cited by
849
References
27
FWCI
46.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Translation of scales in cross‐cultural research: issues and techniques. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04242.x
The paper
Cha, E., Kim, K. H., & Erlen, J. A. (2007). Translation of scales in cross‐cultural research: issues and techniques. Journal of Advanced Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04242.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.