The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Translation of scales in cross‐cultural research: issues and techniques
Open accessAbstract
Aims. This paper is a report of a study designed to: (i) describe issues and techniques of translation of standard measures for use in international research; (ii) identify a user‐friendly and valid translation method when researchers have limited resources during translation procedure; and (iii) discuss translation issues using data from a pilot study as an example. Background. The process of translation is an important part of cross‐cultural studies. Cross‐cultural researchers are often confronted by the need to translate scales from one language to another and to do this with limited resources. Method. The lessons learned from our experience in a pilot study are presented to underline the importance of using appropriate translation procedures. The issues of the back‐translation method are discussed to identify strategies to ensure success when translating measures. Findings. A combined technique is an appropriate method to maintain the content equivalences between the original and translated instruments in international research. There are several possible combinations of translation techniques. However, there is no gold standard of translation techniques because the research environment (e.g. accessibility and availability of bilingual people) and the research questions are different. Conclusions. It is important to use appropriate translation procedures and to employ a combined translation technique based on the research environment and questions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1998) · Cited by 36,049
(1991) · Cited by 15,554
Testing Structural Equation Models.
Mueller, C. W., Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (1994) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074955 · Cited by 14,120
Back-translation for cross-cultural research.
Brislin, R. W. (1970) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/135910457000100301 · Cited by 14,091
Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use
Streiner, D. L., Norman, G. R., & Cairney, J. (1989) · Cited by 9,595
Cross-Cultural Research Methods
Brislin, R. W. (1980) · Environment and Culture · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-0451-5_3 · Cited by 2,067
Bootstrapping goodness-of-fit measures in structural equation models.
Bollen, K. A., & Stine, R. A. (1992) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124192021002004 · Cited by 1,831
Educational Assessment of Students
Nitko, A. J. (1996) · Cited by 1,033
Translating Questionnaires and Other Research Instruments
Behling, O., & Law, K. (2000) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781412986373 · Cited by 887
An Adaptation of Brislin???s Translation Model for Cross-cultural Research
Jones, P. S., Lee, J. W., Phillips, L. R., Zhang, X. E., & Jaceldo, K. B. (2001) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-200109000-00008 · Cited by 846
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Brislin R.W., 1973, Cross‐Cultural Research Method
- John M.T., 2006, Translating the research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders into German: evaluation of content and process, Journal of Orofacial Pain, 20, 43
Cited by
Fifty years of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale: an update and review
Stanford, M. S., Mathias, C. W., Dougherty, D. M., Lake, S. L., Anderson, N. E., & Patton, J. H. (2009) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.04.008 · Cited by 1,609
Cruchinho, P., López-Franco, M. D., Capelas, M. L., Almeida, S., Bennett, P. M., Miranda da Silva, M., Teixeira, G., Nunes, E., Lucas, P., & Gaspar, F. (2024) · Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare · doi:10.2147/jmdh.s419714 · Cited by 469
Swami, V., & Barron, D. (2019) · Body Image · doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2018.08.014 · Cited by 454
Almalki, M. J., FitzGerald, G., & Clark, M. (2012) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-12-314 · Cited by 297
Squires, A., Aiken, L. H., van den Heede, K., Sermeus, W., Bruyneel, L., Lindqvist, R., Schoonhoven, L., Stromseng, I., Busse, R., Brzostek, T., et al. (2013) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.02.015 · Cited by 265
Metadata
- Authors
- Cha, E., Kim, K. H., & Erlen, J. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Advanced Nursing
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-04-17
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 386-395
- ISSN
- 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2648
- OpenAlex
- W2025111410
- Cited by
- 849
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 46.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Translation of scales in cross‐cultural research: issues and techniques. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04242.x
- The paper
- Cha, E., Kim, K. H., & Erlen, J. A. (2007). Translation of scales in cross‐cultural research: issues and techniques. Journal of Advanced Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04242.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.