Cited by 2,067Cross-Cultural and Social AnalysisGlobal and Cross-Cultural ManagementEnvironmental and Social Impact Assessments

Cross-Cultural Research Methods

Brislin, Richard W.·1980·Environment and Culture

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4899-0451-5_3

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Study 1, all materials and measures were translated and back-translated from English to Chinese using Brislin's procedures.

    “We used Brislin’s [58] procedures to translate and back translate all materials and measures from English to Chinese.”
  • Survey instruments were available in English, Spanish, Hindi, Thai, and Bulgarian, and cross-cultural methodology guidelines proposed by Brislin (1980) were followed, including blind back-translations by bilingual experts.

    “Survey instruments were available in English, Spanish, Hindi, Thai, and Bulgarian. Cross-cultural methodology guidelines proposed by Brislin (1980) were followed. This included two bilingual experts for each language, with at least one native speaker, conducting blind back-translations, educated translations, and translating survey questions and participant responses.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brislin, R. W.
Affiliations
East–West Center (US)
Corresponding author
Brislin, Richard W.
Venue
Environment and Culture
Publisher
Springer US
Published
1980
Pages
47-82
OpenAlex
W2003038531
Cited by
2,067
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 94 · 2025: 117 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 71 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 75 · 2018: 60 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 69 · 2015: 66 · 2014: 87 · 2013: 62 · 2012: 75
FWCI
359.64
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Cross-Cultural and Social Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Global and Cross-Cultural Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
Keywords
cross-cultural research, environmental research, environmental assessment, development projects, human behavior, environmental adaptation, international research collaboration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review