Cited by 81Nursing care and researchAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchQualitative research in health

How people with motor neurone disease talk about living with their illness: a narrative study

Open access
Brown, Janice, Addington‐Hall, Julia·2008·Journal of Advanced Nursing

Abstract

AIM: This paper is a report of a study which explores patients' experiences and how they talk about living and coping with motor neurone disease. BACKGROUND: Living with motor neurone disease is challenging, frightening and disabling. It leads to progressive physical decline, normally with a prognosis of 3-5 years. Patients have to deal with many problems, including loss of mobility and the inability to communicate. There is little evidence about how people manage these problems or live with this illness. METHOD: Narrative case studies were used, the unit of analysis being a patient living in their own home or a care home. Thirteen adults were recruited through purposeful sampling. Longitudinal narrative interviews were conducted at three-monthly intervals over an 18-month period in 2005-06. Interviews were analysed focusing on the form and content of the patients' narratives. FINDINGS: Four types of narrative, or storyline were identified. The sustaining storyline is about living life as well as possible through keeping active and engaged in life. In contrast, the enduring storyline concerns living in an insurmountable situation leaving the person feeling disempowered, unable to fight for life or against death. Survival is the essence of the preserving storyline, while the fracturing storyline concerns loss and fear of what is to come. CONCLUSION: Storylines help make sense of complex narratives by encouraging closer attention and active listening to the stories and serve as organizing threads to help patients, families and healthcare professionals better understand living with motor neurone disease.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04588.x

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Burns G.W. (2001) 101 Healing Stories: Using Metaphor in Therapy. John Wiley, New York.
  2. Charon R., Trautmann B.J., Connelly J.E., Hawkins A.H., Hunter K.M., Jones A.H., Montello M. & Poirer S. (1995) Literature and medicine: contributions to medical practice. Annals 122, 618-619.
  3. Frank A. (1995) The Wounded Storyteller. University of Chicago Press, London.
  4. Reissman C.K. (1993) Narrative Analysis. Sage Publications, London.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brown, J., & Addington‐Hall, J.
Affiliations
University of Southampton (GB)
Venue
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-04
Volume
62
Issue
2
Pages
200-208
ISSN
  • 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2648
OpenAlex
W2033106917
Cited by
81
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 5
FWCI
15.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Advanced Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative research in health
Keywords
motor neuron disease, patient experience, coping with illness, illness narratives, storylines, mobility loss, communication disorders, disempowerment, fear of death, home care, care homes, narrative interviews
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Attitude to Health, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Stress, Psychological, Motor Neuron Disease, Narration, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review