Cited by 194Nursing education and managementHealthcare Education and Workforce IssuesOccupational Health and Burnout

Hospital nurse practice environment, burnout, job outcomes and quality of care: test of a structural equation model

Van Bogaert, Peter, Meulemans, Herman, Clarke, Sean, Vermeyen, Karel, Van de Heyning, Paul·2009·Journal of Advanced Nursing

Abstract

AIM: The aim of the study was to investigate relationships between nurse practice environment, burnout, job outcomes and nurse-assessed quality of care. BACKGROUND: A growing line of work confirms that, in countries with distinctly different healthcare systems, nurses report similar shortcomings in their work environments and the quality of care in hospitals. Neither the specific work environment factors most involved in dissatisfaction, burnout and other negative job outcomes, and patient outcomes, nor the mechanisms tying nurse job outcomes to quality of care are well understood. METHOD: A Nurse Practice Environment and Outcome causal structure involving pathways between practice environment dimensions and outcome variables with components of burnout in a mediating position was developed. Survey data from 401 staff nurses across 31 units in two hospitals (including the Revised Nursing Work Index, the Maslach Burnout Inventory, and job outcome and nurse-assessed quality of care variables) were used to test this model using structural equation modelling techniques. The data were collected from December 2006 to January 2007. RESULTS: Goodness of fit statistics confirmed an improved model with burnout dimensions in mediating positions between nurse practice environment dimensions and both job outcomes and nurse-assessed quality of care, explaining 20% and 46% of variation in these two indicators, respectively. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that hospital organizational properties, including nurse-physician relations, are related to quality of care assessments, and to the outcomes of job satisfaction and turnover intentions, with burnout dimensions appearing to play mediating roles. Additionally, a direct relationship between assessments of care quality and management at the unit level was observed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05082.x

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Support from managers predicts low Emotional Exhaustion and high Personal Accomplishment.

    “Van Bogaert and colleagues found that support from managers predicted low Emotional Exhaustion and high Personal Accomplishment [84]”

    From Burnout in nursing: a theoretical review. (2020) · cites this paper as [84]

  • Quality of relationship with physicians is associated with Emotional Exhaustion only in two studies.

    “Two studies found an association with Emotional Exhaustion only [55, 84]”

    From Burnout in nursing: a theoretical review. (2020) · cites this paper as [84]

  • Hospital management and organisational support have a direct effect on Emotional Exhaustion and Personal Accomplishment.

    “Hospital management and organisational support had a direct effect on Emotional Exhaustion and Personal Accomplishment [84]”

    From Burnout in nursing: a theoretical review. (2020) · cites this paper as [84]

  • Depersonalisation and Personal Accomplishment predict job outcomes.

    “reported that Depersonalisation and Personal Accomplishment predict job outcomes [84]”

    From Burnout in nursing: a theoretical review. (2020) · cites this paper as [84]

  • Emotional Exhaustion predicts poor nurse ratings of quality of care.

    “two articles reported that Emotional Exhaustion predicts poor nurse ratings of quality of care [82, 84]”

    From Burnout in nursing: a theoretical review. (2020) · cites this paper as [84]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van Bogaert, P., Meulemans, H., Clarke, S., Vermeyen, K., & Van de Heyning, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Antwerp (BE)
  • Royal Bank of Canada (CA)
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE)
Venue
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-09-11
Volume
65
Issue
10
Pages
2175-2185
ISSN
  • 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2648
OpenAlex
W2015861669
Cited by
194
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 22
FWCI
31.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Advanced Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
Keywords
nursing work environment, burnout, job outcomes, quality of care, job satisfaction, turnover intention, nurse-physician relations, organizational management, mediating role of burnout, hospital nursing staff
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Burnout, Professional, Clinical Competence, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Health Facility Environment, Humans, Job Satisfaction, Male, Middle Aged, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Personnel Turnover, Quality of Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Nursing Administration Research, Workload, Workplace, Physician-Nurse Relations, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review