Cited by 23Cancer survivorship and careProstate Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentCancer-related cognitive impairment studies

Quality of life in men receiving radiotherapy and neo‐adjuvant androgen deprivation for prostate cancer: results from a prospective longitudinal study

Open access
Mc Caughan, Eilis, Mc Sorley, Oonagh, Prue, Gillain, Parahoo, Kader, Bunting, Brendan, Sullivan, Joe O, McKenna, Hugh·2013·Journal of Advanced Nursing

Abstract

Aim. To report a study measuring the quality of life and side effects in men receiving radiotherapy and hormone ablation for prostate cancer up to 1 year after treatment. Background. Prostate cancer incidence is increasing with the result that more men are living longer with the disease and the side effects of treatment. It is important to know the effects this has on their quality of life. Design. Survey. Method. Between September 2006–September 2007, all men who were about to undergo radical conformal radiotherapy ± neo‐adjuvant androgen deprivation for localized prostate cancer were invited to participate in the study; 149 men were recruited. They completed the European Organization on Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire C‐30 and Prostate Cancer module PR25 at four time‐points. Results. At 4–6 weeks after radiotherapy, participants experienced the biggest relative decline in global quality of life, social, physical, and role functioning and an increase in treatment side effects. At 6 months postradiotherapy the majority of men experienced an improvement in their side effects. However, a minority of men were experiencing severe side effects of radiotherapy at 1 year post‐treatment. Single men and men who had a low quality of life prior to radiotherapy, reported a lower quality of life at 1 year after treatment in comparison to married men. Conclusion. Men with prostate cancer suffer limitations due to the symptoms they experience and disruption to their quality of life. It is essential that nurses develop and deliver follow‐up care which is flexible and appropriate to the individual needs of these men.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.05987.x

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Men are less likely to express emotions through venting [68].

    “Given that men are less likely to express emotions through venting [68], it is not surprising that females reported higher scores for this coping strategy.”

    From Psychological variables associated with quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer: the role of body image distress (2022) · cites this paper as [68]

    The Conceptual framework discusses coping with prostate cancer, and the Discussion reports changes in men’s quality of life, but neither addresses whether men are less likely than women to express emotions through venting. Searches for “venting” and emotional expression found no passage making that comparison. Page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Beauchamp T. & Childress J. (1994) Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 4th edn. Oxford University Press.
  2. Eble J.N., Sauter G., Epstein J.I. & Sesterhenn I.A. (eds) (2004) World Health Organization Classification of Tumours. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs. IARC Press, Lyon.
  3. Janda M., Gerstner N., Obermair A., Fuerst A., Wachter S., Dieck- mann K. & Potter R. (2000) Quality of life changes during con- formal radiation therapy for prostate carcinoma. American Journal of Cancer 89(6), 1322-1328.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mc Caughan, E., Mc Sorley, O., Prue, G., Parahoo, K., Bunting, B., Sullivan, J. O., & McKenna, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Ulster (GB)
  • Belfast City Hospital (GB)
Venue
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-03-27
Volume
69
Issue
1
Pages
53-65
ISSN
  • 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2648
OpenAlex
W1890410698
Cited by
23
References
65
Citations by year
2022: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5
FWCI
1.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Advanced Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council (MR/K023241/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Keywords
prostate cancer, quality of life, radiotherapy, androgen deprivation therapy, treatment side effects, EORTC QLQ-C30, social functioning, marital status, follow-up care, nursing care
MeSH terms
Aged, Androgen Antagonists, Combined Modality Therapy, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Prostatic Neoplasms, Quality of Life

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review