Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 509

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Maximal heat dissipation capacity and hyperthermia risk: neglected key factors in the ecology of endotherms

Speakman, John R., Król, Elżbieta·2010·Journal of Animal Ecology

Abstract

Summary: 1 . The role of energy in ecological processes has hitherto been considered primarily from the standpoint that energy supply is limited. That is, traditional resource‐based ecological and evolutionary theories and the recent ‘metabolic theory of ecology’ (MTE) all assume that energetic constraints operate on the supply side of the energy balance equation. 2 . For endothermic animals, we provide evidence suggesting that an upper boundary on total energy expenditure is imposed by the maximal capacity to dissipate body heat and therefore avoid the detrimental consequences of hyperthermia – the heat dissipation limit (HDL) theory. We contend that the HDL is a major constraint operating on the expenditure side of the energy balance equation, and that processes that generate heat compete and trade‐off within a total boundary defined by heat dissipation capacity, rather than competing for limited energy supply. 3 . The HDL theory predicts that daily energy expenditure should scale in relation to body mass ( M b ) with an exponent of about 0·63. This contrasts the prediction of the MTE of an exponent of 0·75. 4 . We compiled empirical data on field metabolic rate (FMR) measured by the doubly‐labelled water method, and found that they scale to M b with exponents of 0·647 in mammals and 0·658 in birds, not significantly different from the HDL prediction ( P > 0·05) but lower than predicted by the MTE ( P < 0·001). The same statistical result was obtained using phylogenetically independent contrasts analysis. Quantitative predictions of the model matched the empirical data for both mammals and birds. There was no indication of curvature in the relationship between Log e FMR and Log e M b . 5 . Together, these data provide strong support for the HDL theory and allow us to reject the MTE, at least when applied to endothermic animals. 6 . The HDL theory provides a novel conceptual framework that demands a reframing of our views of the interplay between energy and the environment in endothermic animals, and provides many new interpretations of ecological and evolutionary phenomena.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01689.x

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Cited by

See all 509

Metadata

Authors
Speakman, J. R., & Król, E.
Venue
Journal of Animal Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-06-07
Volume
79
Issue
4
Pages
726-746
ISSN
  • 0021-8790 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2656
OpenAlex
W1608688915
Cited by
509
References
12
FWCI
24.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Maximal heat dissipation capacity and hyperthermia risk: neglected key factors in the ecology of endotherms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01689.x
The paper
Speakman, J. R., & Król, E. (2010). Maximal heat dissipation capacity and hyperthermia risk: neglected key factors in the ecology of endotherms. Journal of Animal Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01689.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.