The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Guild‐specific patterns of species richness and host specialization in plant–herbivore food webs from a tropical forest
Open accessAbstract
Summary: 1. The extent to which plant–herbivore feeding interactions are specialized is key to understand the processes maintaining the diversity of both tropical forest plants and their insect herbivores. However, studies documenting the full complexity of tropical plant–herbivore food webs are lacking. 2. We describe a complex, species‐rich plant–herbivore food web for lowland rain forest in Papua New Guinea, resolving 6818 feeding links between 224 plant species and 1490 herbivore species drawn from 11 distinct feeding guilds. By standardizing sampling intensity and the phylogenetic diversity of focal plants, we are able to make the first rigorous and unbiased comparisons of specificity patterns across feeding guilds. 3. Specificity was highly variable among guilds, spanning almost the full range of theoretically possible values from extreme trophic generalization to monophagy. 4. We identify guilds of herbivores that are most likely to influence the composition of tropical forest vegetation through density‐dependent herbivory or apparent competition. 5. We calculate that 251 herbivore species (48 of them unique) are associated with each rain forest tree species in our study site so that the ∼200 tree species coexisting in the lowland rain forest community are involved in ∼50 000 trophic interactions with ∼9600 herbivore species of insects. This is the first estimate of total herbivore and interaction number in a rain forest plant–herbivore food web. 6. A comprehensive classification of insect herbivores into 24 guilds is proposed, providing a framework for comparative analyses across ecosystems and geographical regions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Herbivores and the Number of Tree Species in Tropical Forests
Janzen, D. H. (1970) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282687 · Cited by 4,774
Predation, apparent competition, and the structure of prey communities
Holt, R. D. (1977) · Theoretical Population Biology · doi:10.1016/0040-5809(77)90042-9 · Cited by 2,535
The Guild Concept and the Structure of Ecological Communities
Simberloff, D., & Dayan, T. (1991) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.22.110191.000555 · Cited by 883
Agrawal, A. A., & Fishbein, M. (2006) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[132:pds]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 769
Low host specificity of herbivorous insects in a tropical forest
Novotny, V., Basset, Y., Miller, S. E., Weiblen, G. D., Bremer, B., Cizek, L., & Drozd, P. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/416841a · Cited by 660
Self-citationWhy Are There So Many Species of Herbivorous Insects in Tropical Rainforests?
Novotny, V., Drozd, P., Miller, S. E., Kulfan, M., Janda, M., Basset, Y., & Weiblen, G. D. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1129237 · Cited by 589
Self-citationInsects on Plants: Macroevolutionary Chemical Trends in Host Use
Becerra, J. X. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.276.5310.253 · Cited by 492
The structure of an aphid–parasitoid community
MULler, C. B., Adriaanse, I. C. T., Belshaw, R., & Godfray, H. C. J. (1999) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2656.1999.00288.x · Cited by 410
May, R. M. (1990) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1990.0200 · Cited by 395
Host specificity of insect herbivores in tropical forests
Novotny, V., & Basset, Y. (2005) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.3023 · Cited by 380
Self-citation
Cited by
Seven Shortfalls that Beset Large-Scale Knowledge of Biodiversity
Hortal, J., de Bello, F., Diniz-Filho, J. A. F., Lewinsohn, T. M., Lobo, J. M., & Ladle, R. J. (2015) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-112414-054400 · Cited by 1,743
Arthropod Diversity in a Tropical Forest
Basset, Y., Cizek, L., Cuénoud, P., Didham, R. K., Guilhaumon, F., Missa, O., Novotny, V., Ødegaard, F., Roslin, T., Schmidl, J., et al. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1226727 · Cited by 621
Self-citationPlant apparency, an overlooked driver of associational resistance to insect herbivory
Castagneyrol, B., Giffard, B., Péré, C., & Jactel, H. (2013) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2745.12055 · Cited by 290
Spatial Guilds in the Serengeti Food Web Revealed by a Bayesian Group Model
Baskerville, E. B., Dobson, A. P., Bedford, T., Allesina, S., Anderson, T. M., & Pascual, M. (2011) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002321 · Cited by 113
Metadata
- Authors
- Novotny, V., Miller, S. E., Baje, L., Balagawi, S., Basset, Y., Cizek, L., Craft, K. J., Dem, F., Drew, R. A. I., Hulcr, J., Leps, J., Lewis, O. T., Pokon, R., Stewart, A. J. A., Allan Samuelson, G., & Weiblen, G. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Animal Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-07-28
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1193-1203
- ISSN
- 0021-8790 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2656
- OpenAlex
- W2104991477
- Cited by
- 351
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 23.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Guild‐specific patterns of species richness and host specialization in plant–herbivore food webs from a tropical forest. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01728.x
- The paper
- Novotny, V., Miller, S. E., Baje, L., Balagawi, S., Basset, Y., Cizek, L., Craft, K. J., Dem, F., Drew, R. A. I., Hulcr, J., Leps, J., Lewis, O. T., Pokon, R., Stewart, A. J. A., Allan Samuelson, G., & Weiblen, G. D. (2010). Guild‐specific patterns of species richness and host specialization in plant–herbivore food webs from a tropical forest. Journal of Animal Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01728.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.