The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diversity of the Lactobacillus group in breast milk and vagina of healthy women and potential role in the colonization of the infant gut
Open accessAbstract
AIMS: To evaluate the diversity of the Lactobacillus group in breast milk and the vagina of healthy women and understand their potential role in the infant gut colonization using the 16S rRNA gene approaches. METHODS AND RESULTS: Samples of breast milk, vaginal swabs and infant faeces were aseptically collected from five mothers whose neonates were born by vaginal delivery and another five that had their babies by caesarean section. After polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification using Lactobacillus group-specific primers, amplicons were analysed by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE). Clone libraries were constructed to describe the Lactobacillus group diversity. DGGE fingerprints were not related to the delivery method. None of the species detected in vaginal samples were found in breast milk-derived libraries and only few were detected in infant faeces. CONCLUSIONS: The bacterial composition of breast milk and infant faeces is not related to the delivery method. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: It has been suggested that neonates acquire lactobacilli by oral contamination with vaginal strains during delivery; subsequently, newborns would transmit such bacteria to the breast during breastfeeding. However, our findings confirm, at the molecular level that in contrast to the maternal vagina, breast milk seems to constitute a good source of lactobacilli to the infant gut.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Human milk is a source of lactic acid bacteria for the infant gut
Martín, R., Langa, S., Reviriego, C., Jimínez, E., Marín, M. L., Xaus, J., Fernández, L., & Rodríguez, J. M. (2003) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2003.09.028 · Cited by 792
Self-citation
Cited by
Dominguez-Bello, M. G., Costello, E. K., Contreras, M., Magris, M., Hidalgo, G., Fierer, N., & Knight, R. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1002601107 · Cited by 4,774
The infant microbiome development: Mom matters
Mueller, N. T., Bakacs, E., Combellick, J., Grigoryan, Z., & Dominguez-Bello, M. G. (2015) · Trends in Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.molmed.2014.12.002 · Cited by 943
Gastrointestinal Symptoms in Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Meta-analysis
McElhanon, B. O., McCracken, C., Karpen, S., & Sharp, W. G. (2014) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2013-3995 · Cited by 831
Intestinal Bacteria and the Regulation of Immune Cell Homeostasis
Hill, D. A., & Artis, D. (2010) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev-immunol-030409-101330 · Cited by 586
Martín, R., Jiménez, E., Heilig, H., Fernández, L., Marín, M. L., Zoetendal, E. G., & Rodríguez, J. M. (2009) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.02063-08 · Cited by 437
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Martín, R., Heilig, G. H. J., Zoetendal, E. G., Smidt, H., & Rodríguez, J. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Microbiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-07-20
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2638-2644
- ISSN
- 1364-5072 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2122564736
- Cited by
- 238
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diversity of the Lactobacillus group in breast milk and vagina of healthy women and potential role in the colonization of the infant gut. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03497.x
- The paper
- Martín, R., Heilig, G. H. J., Zoetendal, E. G., Smidt, H., & Rodríguez, J. M. (2007). Diversity of the Lactobacillus group in breast milk and vagina of healthy women and potential role in the colonization of the infant gut. Journal of Applied Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03497.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.