The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inactivation mechanisms of lactic acid starter cultures preserved by drying processes
Open accessAbstract
The preservation of lactic acid starter cultures by drying are of increased interest. A further improvement of cell viability is, however, still needed, and the insight into inactivation mechanisms of the cells is a prerequisite. In this present work, we review the inactivation mechanisms of lactic acid starter cultures during drying which are not yet completely understood. Inactivation is not only induced by dehydration inactivation but also by thermal- and cryo-injuries depending on the drying processes employed. The cell membrane has been reported as a major site of damage during drying or rehydration where transitions of membrane phases occur. Some drying processes, such as freeze drying or spray drying, involve subzero or very high temperatures. These physical conditions pose additional stresses to cells during the drying processes. Injuries of cells subjected to freezing temperatures may be due to the high electrolyte concentration (solution effect) or intracellular ice formation, depending on the cooling rate. High temperatures affect most essential cellular components. It is difficult to identify a critical component, although ribosomal functionality is speculated as the primary reason. The activation during storage is mainly due to membrane lipid oxidation, while the storage conditions such as temperature moisture content of the dried starter cultures are important factors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Desiccation tolerance of prokaryotes
Potts, M. (1994) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mr.58.4.755-805.1994 · Cited by 1,382
Stress responses in lactic acid bacteria
van de Guchte, M., Serror, P., Chervaux, C., Smokvina, T., Ehrlich, S. D., & Maguin, E. (2002) · Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · doi:10.1023/a:1020631532202 · Cited by 648
Microbiology and Technology of Fermented Foods
(2006) · doi:10.1002/9780470277515 · Cited by 468
Cited by
Terpou, A., Papadaki, A., Lappa, I., Kachrimanidou, V., Bosnea, L., & Kopsahelis, N. (2019) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu11071591 · Cited by 779
Broeckx, G., Vandenheuvel, D., Claes, I. J. J., Lebeer, S., & Kiekens, F. (2016) · International Journal of Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.04.002 · Cited by 328
Application of spray drying for preservation of lactic acid starter cultures: a review
Peighambardoust, S. H., Golshan Tafti, A., & Hesari, J. (2011) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2011.01.009 · Cited by 323
Influence of casein-based microencapsulation on freeze-drying and storage of probiotic cells
Heidebach, T., Först, P., & Kulozik, U. (2010) · Journal of Food Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2010.01.003 · Cited by 279
Self-citationGao, H., Xie, Y., Li, Z., Bai, C., Zou, L., & Liu, W. (2024) · Food Hydrocolloids · doi:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2024.109908 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Santivarangkna, C., Kulozik, U., & Foerst, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Microbiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-07
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-13
- ISSN
- 1364-5072 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2672
- OpenAlex
- W2080055518
- Cited by
- 315
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 12.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inactivation mechanisms of lactic acid starter cultures preserved by drying processes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.03744.x
- The paper
- Santivarangkna, C., Kulozik, U., & Foerst, P. (2008). Inactivation mechanisms of lactic acid starter cultures preserved by drying processes. Journal of Applied Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.03744.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.