The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Predicting species distributions across the Amazonian and Andean regions using remote sensing data
Abstract
Aim We explore the utility of newly available optical and microwave remote sensing data from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and QuikSCAT (QSCAT) instruments for species distribution modelling at regional to continental scales. Using eight Neotropical species from three taxonomic groups, we assess the extent to which remote sensing data can improve predictions of their geographic distributions. For two bird species, we investigate the specific contributions of different types of remote sensing variables to the predictions and model accuracy at the regional scale, where the benefits of the MODIS and QSCAT satellite data are expected to be most significant. Location South America, with a focus on the tropical and subtropical Andes and the Amazon Basin. Methods Potential geographic distributions of eight species, namely two birds, two mammals and four trees, were modelled with the maxent algorithm at 1‐km resolution over the South American continent using climatic and remote sensing data separately and combined. For each species and model scenario, we assess model performance by testing the agreement between observed and simulated distributions across all thresholds and, in the case of the two focal bird species, at selected thresholds. Results Quantitative performance tests showed that models built with remote sensing and climatic layers in isolation performed well in predicting species distributions, suggesting that each of these data sets contains useful information. However, predictions created with a combination of remote sensing and climatic layers generally resulted in the best model performance across the three taxonomic groups. In Ecuador, the inclusion of remote sensing data was critical in resolving the known geographically isolated populations of the two focal bird species along the steep Amazonian–Andean elevational gradients. Within remote sensing subsets, microwave‐based data were more important than optical data in the predictions of the two bird species. Main conclusions Our results suggest that the newly available remote sensing data (MODIS and QSCAT) have considerable utility in modelling the contemporary geographical distributions of species at both regional and continental scales and in predicting range shifts as a result of large‐scale land‐use change.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
To account for autocorrelation between variables, the authors reduced the 19 bioclimatic variables down to nine using cross-correlation matrices.
“To account for autocorrelation between variables, we reduced the 19 variables down to nine using cross-correlation matrices [41] (see the electronic supplementary material, figure S1 and table S1).”
From Predicting pre-columbian anthropogenic soils in amazonia (2014) · cites this paper as [41]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 56
- 10.1046/j.1466-822X.2002.00275.x · DOI
- 10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00349-6 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01482.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2002.00304.x · DOI
- 10.1038/nature02717 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1466-822X.2002.00305.x · DOI
- Del Hoyo J., 1999, Handbook of the birds of the world, vol. 5, barn‐owls to hummingbirds
- Del Hoyo J., 2003, Handbook of the birds of the world, vol. 8, broadbills to tapaculos
- Egbert S.L., 2002, IGARSS 2002: IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium and 24th Canadian Symposium on Remote Sensing. Volumes I–VI. Proceedings—Remote Sensing: Integrating Our View of the Planet, 2337
- 10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04596.x · DOI · Paper page
- Fjeldså J., 1990, Birds of the High Andes
- 10.1016/S0001-706X(01)00106-1 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1008924322405 · DOI
- 10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1861:RSOVPS]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb00461.x · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0505754103 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00079-2 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2006.04700.x · DOI
- 10.1002/joc.1276 · DOI
- Hugall A., 2002, Reconciling paleodistribution models and comparative phylogeography in the Wet Tropics rainforest land snail Gnarosophia bellendenkerensis (Brazier 1875), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 99, 6112, 10.1073/pnas.092538699 · DOI
- 10.1109/36.701075 · DOI
- 10.1029/98JD02462 · DOI
- 10.1029/01EO00303 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2002.00728.x · DOI
- McPherson J.M., 2007, Effects of species’ ecology on the accuracy of distribution models, Ecography, 30, 135
- 10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00943.x · DOI
- 10.1038/35002501 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00074-3 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0611338104 · DOI
- 10.1080/01431160117096 · DOI
- Nix H., 1986, Atlas of Elapid Snakes of Australia, 4
- 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2001.00604.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2004.03822.x · DOI
- 10.1093/condor/103.3.599 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.02206.x · DOI
- 10.1038/416626a · DOI
- Phillips S., 2006, A brief tutorial on Maxent
- 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TGRS.2002.808301 · DOI
- Ridgely R.S., 2001, The birds of Ecuador
- Ridgely R.S., 1994, The birds of South America. vol. II: the suboscine passerines
- 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1832:NDAFPF]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1080/014311600210146 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01323.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.rse.2008.01.008 · DOI
- Sánchez‐Cordero V., 2000, Museum specimen data predict crop damage by tropical rodents, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 97, 7074, 10.1073/pnas.110489897 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2004.01076.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00006-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/19293 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature02121 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature02716 · DOI
- 10.1109/36.763264 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00070-3 · DOI
- 10.1029/97JD00201 · DOI
- 10.1016/0169-2607(93)90004-5 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-2028.2002.00360.x · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Predicting pre-columbian anthropogenic soils in amazonia
McMichael, C. H., Palace, M. W., Bush, M. B., Braswell, B., Hagen, S., Neves, E. G., Silman, M. R., Tamanaha, E. K., & Czarnecki, C. (2014) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2013.2475 · Cited by 179
Metadata
- Authors
- Buermann, W., Saatchi, S., Smith, T. B., Zutta, B. R., Chaves, J. A., Milá, B., & Graham, C. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Biogeography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-07
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1160-1176
- ISSN
- 0305-0270
- 1365-2699
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review