Cited by 179

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Predicting species distributions across the Amazonian and Andean regions using remote sensing data

Buermann, Wolfgang, Saatchi, Sassan, Smith, Thomas B., Zutta, Brian R., Chaves, Jaime A., Milá, Borja, Graham, Catherine H.·2008·Journal of Biogeography

Abstract

Aim We explore the utility of newly available optical and microwave remote sensing data from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and QuikSCAT (QSCAT) instruments for species distribution modelling at regional to continental scales. Using eight Neotropical species from three taxonomic groups, we assess the extent to which remote sensing data can improve predictions of their geographic distributions. For two bird species, we investigate the specific contributions of different types of remote sensing variables to the predictions and model accuracy at the regional scale, where the benefits of the MODIS and QSCAT satellite data are expected to be most significant. Location South America, with a focus on the tropical and subtropical Andes and the Amazon Basin. Methods Potential geographic distributions of eight species, namely two birds, two mammals and four trees, were modelled with the maxent algorithm at 1‐km resolution over the South American continent using climatic and remote sensing data separately and combined. For each species and model scenario, we assess model performance by testing the agreement between observed and simulated distributions across all thresholds and, in the case of the two focal bird species, at selected thresholds. Results Quantitative performance tests showed that models built with remote sensing and climatic layers in isolation performed well in predicting species distributions, suggesting that each of these data sets contains useful information. However, predictions created with a combination of remote sensing and climatic layers generally resulted in the best model performance across the three taxonomic groups. In Ecuador, the inclusion of remote sensing data was critical in resolving the known geographically isolated populations of the two focal bird species along the steep Amazonian–Andean elevational gradients. Within remote sensing subsets, microwave‐based data were more important than optical data in the predictions of the two bird species. Main conclusions Our results suggest that the newly available remote sensing data (MODIS and QSCAT) have considerable utility in modelling the contemporary geographical distributions of species at both regional and continental scales and in predicting range shifts as a result of large‐scale land‐use change.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2007.01858.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • To account for autocorrelation between variables, the authors reduced the 19 bioclimatic variables down to nine using cross-correlation matrices.

    “To account for autocorrelation between variables, we reduced the 19 variables down to nine using cross-correlation matrices [41] (see the electronic supplementary material, figure S1 and table S1).”

    From Predicting pre-columbian anthropogenic soils in amazonia (2014) · cites this paper as [41]

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 56

  1. 10.1046/j.1466-822X.2002.00275.x · DOI
  2. 10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00349-6 · DOI
  3. 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01482.x · DOI
  4. 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2002.00304.x · DOI
  5. 10.1038/nature02717 · DOI
  6. 10.1046/j.1466-822X.2002.00305.x · DOI
  7. Del Hoyo J., 1999, Handbook of the birds of the world, vol. 5, barn‐owls to hummingbirds
  8. Del Hoyo J., 2003, Handbook of the birds of the world, vol. 8, broadbills to tapaculos
  9. Egbert S.L., 2002, IGARSS 2002: IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium and 24th Canadian Symposium on Remote Sensing. Volumes I–VI. Proceedings—Remote Sensing: Integrating Our View of the Planet, 2337
  10. 10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04596.x · DOI · Paper page
  11. Fjeldså J., 1990, Birds of the High Andes
  12. 10.1016/S0001-706X(01)00106-1 · DOI
  13. 10.1023/A:1008924322405 · DOI
  14. 10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1861:RSOVPS]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  15. 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb00461.x · DOI
  16. 10.1073/pnas.0505754103 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00079-2 · DOI
  18. 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2006.04700.x · DOI
  19. 10.1002/joc.1276 · DOI
  20. Hugall A., 2002, Reconciling paleodistribution models and comparative phylogeography in the Wet Tropics rainforest land snail Gnarosophia bellendenkerensis (Brazier 1875), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 99, 6112, 10.1073/pnas.092538699 · DOI
  21. 10.1109/36.701075 · DOI
  22. 10.1029/98JD02462 · DOI
  23. 10.1029/01EO00303 · DOI
  24. 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2002.00728.x · DOI
  25. McPherson J.M., 2007, Effects of species’ ecology on the accuracy of distribution models, Ecography, 30, 135
  26. 10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00943.x · DOI
  27. 10.1038/35002501 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00074-3 · DOI
  29. 10.1073/pnas.0611338104 · DOI
  30. 10.1080/01431160117096 · DOI
  31. Nix H., 1986, Atlas of Elapid Snakes of Australia, 4
  32. 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2001.00604.x · DOI
  33. 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2004.03822.x · DOI
  34. 10.1093/condor/103.3.599 · DOI
  35. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.02206.x · DOI
  36. 10.1038/416626a · DOI
  37. Phillips S., 2006, A brief tutorial on Maxent
  38. 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1109/TGRS.2002.808301 · DOI
  40. Ridgely R.S., 2001, The birds of Ecuador
  41. Ridgely R.S., 1994, The birds of South America. vol. II: the suboscine passerines
  42. 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1832:NDAFPF]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  43. 10.1080/014311600210146 · DOI
  44. 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01323.x · DOI
  45. 10.1016/j.rse.2008.01.008 · DOI
  46. Sánchez‐Cordero V., 2000, Museum specimen data predict crop damage by tropical rodents, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 97, 7074, 10.1073/pnas.110489897 · DOI
  47. 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2004.01076.x · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00006-3 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1038/19293 · DOI
  50. 10.1038/nature02121 · DOI
  51. 10.1038/nature02716 · DOI
  52. 10.1109/36.763264 · DOI
  53. 10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00070-3 · DOI
  54. 10.1029/97JD00201 · DOI
  55. 10.1016/0169-2607(93)90004-5 · DOI
  56. 10.1046/j.1365-2028.2002.00360.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Buermann, W., Saatchi, S., Smith, T. B., Zutta, B. R., Chaves, J. A., Milá, B., & Graham, C. H.
Venue
Journal of Biogeography
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-07
Volume
35
Issue
7
Pages
1160-1176
ISSN
  • 0305-0270
  • 1365-2699
Cited by
179
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review