Cited by 92Cardiac Arrest and ResuscitationPatient Safety and Medication ErrorsEmergency and Acute Care Studies

A literature review: factors that impact on nurses’ effective use of the Medical Emergency Team (MET)

Jones, Lisa, King, Lindy, Wilson, Christine·2009·Journal of Clinical Nursing

Abstract

Aims and objectives. The aim of this literature review is to identify factors, both positive and negative, that impact on nurses’ effective use of the Medical Emergency Team (MET) in acute care settings. Background. Outcomes for patients are often dependent on nurses’ ability to identify and respond to signs of increasing illness and initiate medical intervention. In an attempt to improve patient outcomes, many acute hospitals have implemented a rapid response system known as the Medical Emergency Team (MET) which has improved management of critically ill ward patients. Subsequent research has indicated that the MET system continues to be underused by nurses. Design. A comprehensive thematic literature review. Methods. The review was undertaken using key words and the electronic databases of Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), OVID/MEDLINE, Blackwell Synergy, Science Direct and Informit. Fifteen primary research reports were relevant and included in the review. Results. Five major themes emerged from the analysis of the literature as the major factors effecting nurses’ use of the MET system. They were: education on the MET, expertise, support by medical and nursing staff, nurses’ familiarity with and advocacy for the patient and nurses’ workload. Conclusions. Ongoing education on all aspects of the MET system is recommended for nursing, medical and MET staff. Bringing MET education into undergraduate programs to prepare new graduates entering the workforce to care for acutely ill patients is also strongly recommended. Further research is also needed to determine other influences on MET activation. Relevance to clinical practice. Strategies that will assist nurses to use the MET system more effectively include recruitment and retention of adequate numbers of permanent skilled staff thereby increasing familiarity with and advocacy for the patient. Junior doctors and nurses should be encouraged to attend ward MET calls to gain skills in management of acutely ill patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02944.x

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jones, L., King, L., & Wilson, C.
Affiliations
Flinders University (AU)
Corresponding author
King, Lindy
Venue
Journal of Clinical Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-11-10
Volume
18
Issue
24
Pages
3379-3390
ISSN
  • 0962-1067 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2702
OpenAlex
W2151336534
Cited by
92
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Flinders Academic Commons (Flinders University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
Keywords
medical emergency team, rapid response system, acute care, MET activation, nursing education, nursing expertise, staff support, patient advocacy, nursing workload, medical residents, staff recruitment and retention
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Australia, Clinical Competence, Education, Nursing, Continuing, Emergencies, Emergency Treatment, Female, Humans, Interprofessional Relations, Male, Nurse Clinicians, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Patient Care Team, Quality of Health Care, Nurse's Role

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review