The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Examining user acceptance of computer technology: an empirical study of student teachers
Abstract
Abstract The use of computer technology in schools has made slow progress since the mid‐1980s even though governments have been generous in funding. It is therefore important to understand how and when teachers use computer technology in order to devise implementation strategies to encourage them. This study investigates student teachers' perceptions of computer technology in relation to their intention to use computers. The purpose is to shed light on more effective ways to motivate the use of computer technology in schools. Based on an expanded variation of the Technology Acceptance Model, 84 completed surveys of student teachers were collected at a local university in Sweden. Overall, the results indicated that (1) student teachers' perceived usefulness of computer technology had a direct significant effect on their intention to use it; (2) student teachers' perceived ease of use had only an indirect significant effect on intention to use; however, (3) student teachers' subjective norm, that is the possible influence of external expectations, did not have any direct or indirect significant effects on their intention to use computer technology. Theoretical and practical implications that follow from the results are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2.3.192 · Cited by 9,150
Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.6.2.144 · Cited by 8,815
Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model
Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(01)00143-4 · Cited by 4,250
Mathieson, K. (1991) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2.3.173 · Cited by 4,216
Cited by
Modelling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers
Teo, T. (2009) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.08.006 · Cited by 1,009
Holden, H., & Rada, R. (2011) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2011.10782576 · Cited by 584
Teo, T., & Noyes, J. (2011) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.03.002 · Cited by 531
An empirical study of instructor adoption of web-based learning systems
Wang, W.-T., & Wang, C.-C. (2009) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.02.021 · Cited by 397
Pynoo, B., Devolder, P., Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Duyck, W., & Duyck, P. (2011) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.10.005 · Cited by 334
Metadata
- Authors
- Ma, W. W., Andersson, R., & Streith, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-11-16
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 387-395
- ISSN
- 0266-4909 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2729
- OpenAlex
- W2101979905
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 20.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Examining user acceptance of computer technology: an empirical study of student teachers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00145.x
- The paper
- Ma, W. W., Andersson, R., & Streith, K. (2005). Examining user acceptance of computer technology: an empirical study of student teachers. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00145.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.