The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The use of computer technology in university teaching and learning: a critical perspective
Abstract
Abstract Despite huge efforts to position information and communication technology (ICT) as a central tenet of university teaching and learning, the fact remains that many university students and faculty make only limited formal academic use of computer technology. Whilst this is usually attributed to a variety of operational deficits on the part of students, faculty, and universities, this paper considers the wider social relations underpinning the relatively modest use of technology in higher education. The paper explores how university use of computer technology is shaped into marginalized and curtailed positions by a variety of actors. From the ‘writing’ of ICT at a national policy level through to the marginalization of ICT within the lived ‘student experience’, a consistent theme emerges where computer technology use is constructed in limited, linear, and rigid terms far removed from the creative, productive, and empowering uses which are often celebrated by educational technologists. In the light of such constraints, the paper considers how these dominant constructions of a peripheral and limited use of ICT may be challenged by the higher education community. In particular, it concludes by reflecting on current critical thinking about how educational technologists can foster a more expansive and empowered use of computer technology within university settings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Social Construction of Technological Systems
Westrum, R. (1989) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/030631289019001010 · Cited by 3,368
Raymond, E. (1999) · Knowledge, Technology & Policy · doi:10.1007/s12130-999-1026-0 · Cited by 2,915
Markets, choice, and equity in education
Gewirtz, S., Ball, S. J., & Bowe, R. (1995) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,291
Feenberg, A. (2012) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203022313 · Cited by 1,207
City of Bits: Space, Place, and the Infobahn
Mitchell, W. J. (1995) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1847.001.0001 · Cited by 685
Alternative Perspectives on the Student Experience: Alienation and engagement
Mann, S. J. (2001) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075070020030689 · Cited by 673
DEEM, R. (2001) · Comparative Education · doi:10.1080/03050060020020408 · Cited by 666
Critical Theory of Technology.
Liu, A., & Feenberg, A. (1992) · MLN · doi:10.2307/2904830 · Cited by 649
The social shaping of technology
Wyatt, S. (1986) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(86)90010-7 · Cited by 624
Increasing interactivity in lectures using an electronic voting system
Draper, S. W., & Brown, M. I. (2004) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00074.x · Cited by 548
Cited by
Looking beyond learning: notes towards the critical study of educational technology
Selwyn, N. (2010) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00338.x · Cited by 584
Self-citationBlin, F., & Munro, M. (2008) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.017 · Cited by 482
Englund, C., Olofsson, A. D., & Price, L. (2017) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2016.1171300 · Cited by 423
Digital divides? Student and staff perceptions of information and communication technologies
Waycott, J., Bennett, S., Kennedy, G., Dalgarno, B., & Gray, K. (2010) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.006 · Cited by 381
Postdigital Education in Design and Practice
Fawns, T. (2019) · Postdigital Science and Education · doi:10.1007/s42438-018-0021-8 · Cited by 365
Metadata
- Authors
- Selwyn, N.
- Venue
- Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-01-11
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 83-94
- ISSN
- 0266-4909 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2729
- OpenAlex
- W1945978549
- Cited by
- 598
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 70.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The use of computer technology in university teaching and learning: a critical perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00204.x
- The paper
- Selwyn, N. (2007). The use of computer technology in university teaching and learning: a critical perspective. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00204.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.